6.8 Western vs. 6.5 Creedmoor: Is the 6.5 Already Obsolete?
The 6.5 Creedmoor is beloved by many for its long-range shooting capabilities.
However, the 6.8 Western recently emerged as a worthy contender to dethrone it.
Is that possible?
When comparing 6.8 Western vs. 6.5 Creedmoor, which one comes out on top?
Let's find out.
6.8 Western Vs 6.5 Creedmoor
The 6.5 Creedmoor cartridge and 6.8 Western cartridge look similar to one other and the 270 WSM. If you're not paying close attention, it it’s easy to mix them up. Just don't let their similar appearances deceive you into thinking they perform exactly the same.
We'll walk through both cartridges’ performance to discern which categories each excels in. At the end of the article, we will determine a winner.
Cartridge Specs
The 6.8 Western round and 6.5 Creedmoor round may appear similar to each other, but there are noticeable differences if you know where to look.
Let's start with the bullets. The 6.5 Creedmoor has a .264" bullet; the 6.8 Western, .277".
The wider 6.8 Western bullet typically weighs comes in 162 to 175 grains. In contrast, 6.5 Creedmoor bullets conventionally weigh 90 to 156 grains. It would be highly unusual for a 6.5 Creedmoor cartridge to have a heavier bullet than a 6.8 Western.
The 6.8 Western has a case length of 2.02" and maximum cartridge overall length (COAL) of 2.955”. The latter figure is slightly greater than 2.80” – the traditional max COAL of a short-action rifle cartridge. In contrast, the 6.5 Creedmoor has a case length of 1.92" and COAL of 2.825".
| 6.8 Western | 6.5 Creedmoor | |
|---|---|---|
| Parent Case | 270 WSM | 30 Thompson Center |
| Bullet Diameter | 0.277" | 0.264" |
| Neck Diameter | 0.314" | 0.295" |
| Base Diameter | 0.555" | 0.4703" |
| Case Length | 2.02" | 1.92" |
| Overall Length | 2.755"–2.955" | 2.825" |
| Case Capacity | 74 grains H₂O | 52.5 grains H₂O |
| Max Pressure (SAAMI) | 65,000 psi | 62,000 psi |
The shoulder angle of the 6.8 Western is 35°; the 6.5 Creedmoor, 30°.
The 6.5 Creedmoor has a smaller rim diameter (.473") than the 6.8 Western (.535").
The 6.5 Creedmoor’s smaller case quite naturally has lower capacity: 52.5 grains H2O, as opposed to 74.0 grains H2O for the 6.8 Western. The larger cartridge also has the higher chamber pressure: 65,000 psi max, which is almost 5% higher than the 6.5 Creedmoor’s 62,000 psi max.
6.8 Western Recoil vs. 6.5 Creedmoor Recoil
As a younger shooter, I was hesitant to fire a gun with a lot of recoil. As I've matured, I have learned to handle recoil better (though I'm by no means an expert marksman).
Even so, I still find that lighter recoil equates to better accuracy. It’s also easier on the shoulder, which matters more while you’re firing dozens of rounds at the range as opposed to a couple during a day of hunting.
Recoil doesn’t matter as much to me while I’m hunting and my adrenaline is pumping, but I still don't want a rifle that will knock me out of my tree stand! (And if YOU want an enjoyable hunting experience this fall, make sure to stock up on Hornady 6.5 Creedmoor hunting ammo!)
Free recoil (an objective measure of recoil) is determined by four factors: firearm weight, propellant weight, bullet weight, and muzzle velocity. By that measure, the 6.8 Western conventionally generates around 30.0 foot-pounds (ft-lbs) of recoil; the 6.5 Creedmoor, only around half that much. In other words, if you're sensitive to recoil, the 6.5 Creedmoor is the better option for you.
Trajectory
The flatter the bullet’s trajectory, the easier it is to aim.
All bullets fly in an arch due to gravity, but a faster bullet will exhibit less drop over the same distance than a slower-moving one.
The 6.8 Western may fire heavier bullets, but it does so at a higher velocity – hence its flatter trajectory.
Zeroed in at 500 yards, a 6.8 Western 162 grain Copper Extreme Point exhibits -19.4” drop at 600 yards. At the same zero, a 6.5 Creedmoor 142 grain AccuBond Long Range exhibits -23.2” drop at 600.
Relative performance varies considerably, but the 6.8 Western delivers a flatter trajectory in most circumstances.
Accuracy
Several factors influence a cartridge’s accuracy – the shooter and their rifle being chief among them. For that reason, it’s impossible to really declare one round more accurate than the other.
Furthermore, both of these cartridges are designed for long-distance shooting. In the hands of an experienced marksman, there may be no discernable difference in accuracy.
But for the average shooter, such as myself, the 6.5 Creedmoor will be slightly more accurate than the 6.8 Western due to its lighter recoil.
The winner, by a slight margin, is the 6.5 Creedmoor.
Ballistic Coefficient
Ballistic coefficient (BC) measures how well a bullet resists wind drift and frontal air resistance; the higher its BC, the more efficiently a bullet conserves its momentum. To put it another way, BC is a numerical representation of how aerodynamic a bullet is.
All other things being equal, heavier bullets have higher BCs than lighter ones. They have more mass, and therefore conserve more momentum as they race downrange.
BC varies from bullet to bullet based on design, weight, and other factors beyond this article's scope. Generally over .500 is considered a high ballistic coefficient.
A 6.8 Western 175 grain TGK has a G1 BC of 0.617; 170 grain TMK, 0.641. A 6.5 Creedmoor’s lighter 140 grain TGK has a G1 BC of 0.563; 130 grain TGK, 0.510.
The 6.8 Western typically has a slightly higher G1 BC, although there are some exceptions. It doesn’t dominate this category, but it does win it.
Stopping Power
Many internet warriors will argue that stopping power doesn't matter. They're right, to a point. A well-placed shot from a small, weak cartridge (with little stopping power) can indeed be every bit as effective as a shot from a larger round.
However, stopping power matters because not every shot is perfectly placed.
Generally speaking, a bigger bullet will create a bigger hole. Many larger calibers do boast superior stopping power, although bullet design also matters a great deal. For example, a nonexpanding full metal jacket (FMJ) won't cause as much damage as a jacketed hollow point (JHP), which is designed to widen out as it tunnels through its target.
Stopping power is also determined by how well the bullet penetrates the target. This is often measured as sectional density (SD): a function of a bullet’s diameter relative to its mass.
Relatively speaking, the 6.5 Creedmoor has a higher SD. When a 6.5 Creedmoor bullet weighs 148 grains, its SD is approximately the same as a 6.8 Western 162 grain bullet (~.303). But because the 6.8 Western bullet can weigh more, it can accordingly have a higher SD. At 175 grains, its SD is .326. In contrast, the 6.5 Creedmoor’s heaviest conventional bullet (156 grains) has an SD of just .320.
The 6.8 Western is the winner of this section. It strikes with greater energy at any range, and it has higher capacity for penetration when its bullets are significantly heavier.
Hunting
The 6.8 Western was designed as a hunting cartridge. The 6.5 Creedmoor wasn’t, but that did nothing to prevent it from becoming popular for that application.
The 6.5 Creedmoor is better for taking varmints and medium game, such as the mighty whitetail, but its narrower bullet isn’t recommended for taking large game.
The 6.8 Western is capable of ethically harvesting elk. You can even use it for moose hunting, although most hunters prefer even larger calibers for knocking Bullwinkle’s block off.
The 6.8 Western edges out the 6.5 Creedmoor when it comes to the size of the critter it can take down. We’ll declare it the winner for this reason, even though the 6.5 Creedmoor excels at taking small game.
Home Defense
Unless you're defending your home from an invading army that's still a long way off, I wouldn't recommend these rounds for home defense. They’re just too powerful: certain to slow you down with their recoil, and likely to pass through multiple walls which can jeopardize innocent bystanders.
That's why I recommend using a 12 Gauge or 20 Gauge for home defense, and a 9mm or 45 ACP for self-defense.
If you only own one gun and it's chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor or 6.8 Western, by all means, use it to defend yourself, but you should understand the risks you're taking.
This section is a tie. Neither cartridge is suitable for defense.
Long-Range Performance
The 6.5 Creedmoor has incredible long-range performance. It's not even close when we compare 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 308 Winchester. The 6.5 Creedmoor easily outperforms the 308 Win, which is precisely what it was designed to do!
But what about the 6.8 Western? How does it measure up to the 6.5 Creedmoor?
The 6.8 Western trumps the 6.5 Creedmoor in long-distance shooting because it has a flatter trajectory, a heavier bullet that resists wind drift more effectively, and greater downrange striking power.
The 6.8 Western is the by far the better choice for long-range applications.
Ammo Cost & Availability
One of the most important factors to consider before purchasing a firearm is ammo availability and cost.
If you enjoy shooting at the range often, it's better to go with the ammo that is more readily available and costs less per trigger pull (unless you have a well-stocked trust fund).
The 6.5 Creedmoor is the older and more popular round. More companies manufacture ammo for it, such as Winchester, Hornady, Browning, and 6.5 Sellier & Bellot.
The cost per round for 6.5 Creedmoor is $1.50 to $2.75 (at the time of writing).
The 6.8 Western is still a new cartridge. It’s more difficult to find because fewer manufacturers are making it.
Winchester and Browning are the two primary companies that make 6.8 Western ammo for the. As of this writing, it will cost around $2.95 to $4.60 per round.
The 6.5 Creedmoor wins this category because the ammo is easier to find and less expensive.
Rifle Cost & Availability
Winchester and Browning are currently the only two companies making rifles chambered in 6.8 Western (which makes sense, because they developed the cartridge). That means they set the price for the rifles. Thankfully, they're reasonable.
A Winchester XPR chambered in 6.8 Western costs $599 (at the time of writing), which is the same price as the same short-action rifle chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor.
A Model 70 chambered for either round also costs the same: $1,629.
The Browning X-Bolt chambered in 6.8 Western costs $2,699. Chambered for 6.5 Creedmoor, it costs $2,679.
This difference is minor, but the number of companies that make 6.5 Creedmoor firearms compared to the number that make rifles chambered in 6.8 Western is astounding.
Mossberg, Nosler, Ruger, Remington, Springfield Armory, Weatherby, and many others produce rifles chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor.
In summary, the cost of 6.8 Western rifles and 6.5 Creedmoor rifles is nearly the same, but the overwhelming availability of the 6.5 Creedmoor gives it the win in this section.
Reloading
Reloading is one of the best ways to save money on ammo. Better yet, it allows you to fire more consistent ammo than you could purchase from any factory.
Once you figure out which bullet works best with the twist rate in your barrel and which powder that burns cleanest, you can fine-tune each round for optimum performance.
Both of these rounds can be reloaded. However, since the 6.5 Creedmoor is the older round, more reloading data are available. Plus, the reloading supplies are easier to find.
Keep in mind this also means there's a higher demand for 6.5 Creedmoor components, so they may become difficult to find when supplies are low.
As the 6.8 Western grows in popularity, so too will availability of components and data. Until then, the 6.5 Creedmoor wins this round.
6.8 Western vs. 6.5 Creedmoor Ballistics
The ballistics of both rounds are similar because they're intended to be used in comparable scenarios.
However, they are not precisely the same. Let’s examine their differences in greater detail.
6.8 Western Ballistics
Note: This information comes from ammo manufacturers. Actual ballistics obtained with your firearm can vary considerably from advertised ballistics. Also, ballistics can vary from lot to lot with the same brand and type load.
| Mfr | Brand | Product No. | Bullet | Barrel Length (in) | G1 BC | Velocity (fps) | Energy (ft-lbs) | Elevation (in) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds | ||||||
| Norma | Oryx | 20174912 | 180gr SP | 26 | 0.354 | 2960 | 2696 | 2448 | 2212 | 1990 | 1782 | 1591 | 1419 | 1270 | 1150 | 1062 | 3502 | 2906 | 2395 | 1957 | 1583 | 1270 | 1012 | 805 | 645 | 529 | 451 | -3.0 | 9.6 | 17.3 | 19.3 | 14.1 | 0.0 | -25.0 | -63.8 | -119.9 | -197.7 | -301.9 |
| Federal | Gold Medal | GM300NMBH1 | 215gr HPBT | 24 | 0.691 | 3000 | 2862 | 2728 | 2598 | 2472 | 2349 | 2229 | 2113 | 2001 | 1892 | 1787 | 4297 | 3910 | 3553 | 3222 | 2917 | 2634 | 2373 | 2132 | 1912 | 1710 | 1525 | -3.0 | 7.0 | 12.8 | 13.9 | 9.8 | 0.0 | -16.1 | -39.2 | -70.1 | -109.6 | -158.9 |
| Norma | - | 20174602 | 230gr Hybrid Target | 26 | 0.743 | 2986 | 2858 | 2733 | 2612 | 2494 | 2379 | 2267 | 2158 | 2052 | 1949 | 1850 | 4554 | 4171 | 3815 | 3485 | 3177 | 2891 | 2625 | 2379 | 2151 | 1941 | 1748 | -3.0 | 7.0 | 12.7 | 13.7 | 9.7 | 0.0 | -15.8 | -38.3 | -68.4 | -106.7 | -154.2 |
6.5 Creedmoor Ballistics Chart
Note: This information comes from ammo manufacturers. Actual ballistics obtained with your firearm can vary considerably from advertised ballistics. Also, ballistics can vary from lot to lot with the same brand and type load.
For a comprehensive analysis of 6.5 Creedmoor ballistics including energy, velocity, and trajectory data across various bullet weights and distances, check out our detailed 6.5 Creedmoor ballistics tables.
| Mfr | Brand | Product No. | Bullet | Barrel Length (in) | G1 BC | Velocity (fps) | Energy (ft-lbs) | Elevation (in) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds | ||||||
| Copper Creek | - | - | 180gr Partition | 24 | 0.361 | 3080 | 2814 | 2564 | 2327 | 2103 | 1891 | 1694 | 1515 | 1355 | 1220 | 1114 | 3792 | 3166 | 2628 | 2165 | 1767 | 1430 | 1148 | 917 | 734 | 595 | 496 | -3.0 | 8.5 | 15.6 | 17.3 | 12.6 | 0.0 | -22.3 | -56.8 | -106.5 | -175.3 | -267.4 |
| Berger | - | 55030 | 215gr Hybrid Target | 24 | 0.691 | 2940 | 2803 | 2671 | 2543 | 2418 | 2297 | 2179 | 2064 | 1954 | 1847 | 1744 | 4127 | 3753 | 3407 | 3088 | 2792 | 2519 | 2267 | 2035 | 1822 | 1628 | 1452 | -3.0 | 7.4 | 13.4 | 14.5 | 10.2 | 0.0 | -16.8 | -41.0 | -73.3 | -114.8 | -166.4 |
| Copper Creek | - | - | 230gr Hybrid Target | 24 | 0.717 | 2850 | 2721 | 2596 | 2474 | 2356 | 2240 | 2128 | 2019 | 1914 | 1812 | 1714 | 4149 | 3782 | 3442 | 3127 | 2835 | 2564 | 2314 | 2083 | 1871 | 1677 | 1501 | -3.0 | 8.0 | 14.3 | 15.4 | 10.9 | 0.0 | -17.8 | -43.2 | -77.2 | -120.7 | -174.8 |
6.8 Western Development
The 6.8 Western traces its roots to the 270 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) released in 2002, as well as its parent cartridge the 270 Winchester.
The 270 WSM fell short in a few key areas (primarily the lack of twist rate in the rifle barrels), so Winchester and Browning teamed up to improve it with a new cartridge that could handle a faster twist.
They accomplished their goal with the 6.8 Western, which they released in 2021. They initially received a lot of criticism for introducing a new round instead of increasing the production of others because they were struggling to keep up with demand. However, that criticism has subsided, and the popularity of the 6.8 Western is beginning to rise amongst long-range shooters and hunters.
6.5 Creedmoor Development
The 6.5 Creedmoor was created out of necessity. In 2005 Dennis Demille was approached by several competition shooters complaining about the unreliability of their guns and 6mmXC ammo.
He talked with his friend Dave Emary, Hornady's senior ballistician, who told Demille to make a list of what he wanted from a new cartridge.
Demille came back with his list-
- Able to fit into a magazine for rapid-fire stages of the competition
- Less recoil than a 308 Winchester for better follow-up shots and shooter comfort during rapid fire
- Flatter trajectory than a 308 with an accurate, high BC bullet
- Good barrel life
- Uses readily available reloading components so results can be duplicated
- Reloading recipes printed on the box
- Produced in quantities that could keep up with demand
In 2007, Hornady debuted the 6.5 Creedmoor. At first, most people were skeptical of the round, believing it to be too small for hunting and not powerful enough for long-range competitions.
It didn't take long for the nay-sayers to become fans. The rest is history.
Parting Shots
If my math is correct, the 6.5 Creedmoor won 6/11 categories, making it the winner by a narrow margin. That being said, I think it is pretty apparent that both rounds are highly effective. Neither would be a terrible choice for long-range shooting.
However, when it comes to the 6.8 Western vs. 6.5 Creedmoor debate, the lesser recoil of the latter gives it an edge for most people.
If you're a big game hunter, the 6.8 Western is the way to go.
I can confidently say the 6.5 Creedmoor is not obsolete.
Ammo Comparisons
- .308 vs 5.56
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs .308
- .300 Blackout vs .308
- .300 Win Mag vs .308
- .243 vs .308
- .308 vs .30-06
- 7mm-08 vs .308
- .270 vs .308
- 7.62x39 vs .308
- .223 vs .308
- .338 Lapua vs .308
- .380 ACP vs 9mm
- .223 vs 5.56
- .300 Blackout vs 5.56
- 9mm vs 45 ACP
- 9mm vs 40 S&W
- .357 SIG vs 9mm
- 10mm vs 9mm
- 9mm vs 9mm Luger
- .243 vs .270
- .300 Win Mag vs .30-06
- .270 vs .30-06
- .40 vs .45
- 38 Special vs 357
- 9mm vs 40 vs 45
- 5.56 vs 7.62x39
- 338 Lapua vs .30-06
- .30-30 vs .30-06
- 300 PRC vs 338 Lapua
- .30-06 vs 7mm
- 300 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua
- 300 PRC vs 300 Win Mag
- 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag
- 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua
- 12 Gauge vs 20 Gauge
- 10mm vs 357 Mag
- .30-30 vs 7.62x39
- 224 Valkyrie vs 22-250
- 17 HMR vs 22 Mag
- 7.62x39 vs .300 Blackout
- 45 ACP vs 45 Auto
- 45-70 vs 30-30
- 300 Blackout vs 223
- 357 Magnum vs 9mm
- 350 Legend vs 300 Blackout
- 224 Valkyrie vs 223
- 45 ACP vs 38 Super
- 6.5 Grendel vs .308
- 17 HMR vs 22 LR
- 10 Gauge vs 12 Gauge
- 22-250 vs 223
- 45 Colt vs 45 ACP
- 350 Legend vs 30-30
- 5.7x28 vs 223
- 5.7 vs 9mm
- 5.56 vs 5.7
- 22 vs 9mm
- Buckshot vs Birdshot
- 450 Bushmaster vs 308
- 450 Bushmaster vs 223
- Buckshot vs Slug
- 6.5 Grendel vs 5.56
- 6mm ARC vs 6.5 Grendel
- 44 vs 45
- 458 SOCOM vs 5.56
- 357 vs 44
- 32 ACP vs 380
- 300 Win Mag vs 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua Mag
- 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM vs 50 Beowulf
- 6mm Creedmoor vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- TMJ vs FMJ
- 44 Special Vs 44 Magnum
- 45 90 vs 45 70
- 6.8 Western vs 6.8 SPC
- 50 Beowulf vs 50 BMG
- 26 Nosler vs 6.5 PRC
- 28 Gauge vs 410
- 6.8 SPC vs 5.56
- 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel
- 6.8 Western vs 7mm Rem Mag vs .28 Nosler
- 6.8 Western vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 22 Hornet vs 223
- 6.8 Western vs 6.5 PRC
- .410 vs 12 Gauge
- .410 vs 20 Gauge
- 22 LR vs 22 Mag
- 6mm ARC vs 243
- 7mm-08 vs 270
- 243 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- Nickel vs Brass Casing
- 204 Ruger vs 223
- 50 Beowulf vs 5.56
- 260 Remington vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 6mm Remington vs 243
- 28 Nosler vs 300 PRC
- 50 Beowulf vs 50 AE
- 22 Nosler vs 22-250
- 450 Marlin vs 45-70
- 300 Win Mag vs 300 Norma
- 458 SOCOM vs 300 Blackout
- 38-55 vs 45-70
- 22 Hornet vs 22 LR
- 300 Norma vs 338 Lapua
- 338 Lapua vs 50 BMG
- 28 Nosler vs 300 Win Mag
- 28 Nosler vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 204 vs 22-250
- 458 SOCOM vs 45 70
- 44 40 vs 45 70
- 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 450 Bushmaster vs 30-06
- 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag
- 30 Carbine vs 223
- 25-06 vs 30-06
- 26 Nosler vs 28 Nosler
- 16ga vs 12ga
- 30 06 vs 7.62 x54R
- 9mm Makarov vs 9mm Luger
- 350 Legend vs 223
- 30 Carbine vs 5.56
- 6.5x55 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs 270
- M193 vs M855
- 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM
- 6.5 Grendel vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 350 Legend vs 5.56
- .277 Fury vs 6.8 SPC
- 277 Fury vs 300 Win Mag
- 10mm vs .45 ACP
- 277 Fury vs 223
- 6.8 SPC vs 300 Blackout
- 6.5 PRC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 277 Fury vs 308
- 277 Fury vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 350 Legend vs 450 Bushmaster
- 277 Fury Vs 5.56 NATO
- 10mm vs 40S&W
- 32 ACP vs 9mm
- 32 Special vs 9mm
- 8.6 Blackout vs 300 Blackout
- 30 Super Carry vs. 9mm
- 5.56 vs 9mm
- .50 Action Express vs 9mm
- 7.62x25 vs. 9mm
- 10mm vs 44 Magnum
- 300 Blackout vs 300 Win Mag
- 6.5 Grendel vs 300 Blackout
- 460 Rowland vs 10mm
- 300 RUM vs 300 PRC
- 300 Norma vs 300 PRC
- 45 GAP vs 45 ACP
- 7mm PRC vs 300 Win Mag
- 300 PRC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 300 PRC vs 308
- 357 SIG vs 357 Mag
- 7.62x39 vs 7.62x51
- 243 Win vs 223 Rem
- 30 Nosler vs 300 PRC
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 30-06 Springfield
- 450 S&W vs. 44 Magnum
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 300 Win Mag
- 454 Cassull vs. 45-70 Govt
- 454 Cassull vs. 44 Mag
- 7.62x54r vs. 308 Winchester
- 22 ARC vs. 223 Rem
- Subsonic vs. Supersonic Ammo
- Hornady Critical Defense vs. Critical Duty
- 45 Colt vs. 45 Long Colt
- 25 ACP vs. 22 LR
- 45 Long Colt vs. 44 Magnum
- 38 Special vs. 38 S&W
- 44 Special vs. 357 Magnum
- 5.45 vs. 5.56
- 38 Special vs. 380 ACP
- 30-06 vs. 5.56
- 6mm ARC vs. 5.56 NATO
- 38 Super vs. 9mm
- 22 ARC vs. 6mm ARC
- 408 CheyTac vs. 50 BMG
- 44 Special vs. 45 ACP
- 380 ACP vs. 45 ACP
- 22 LR vs. 223 Rem
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 223 Rem
- 25 ACP vs. 9mm
- 357 Magnum vs. 45 ACP
- 28 Gauge vs. 20 Gauge