6.8 SPC vs. 6.5 Creedmoor: Long-Range Advantage or Stopping Power?
The 6.8 Remington Special Purpose Cartridge (SPC) and 6.5 Creedmoor are two centerfire rifle rounds that were developed for drastically different purposes.
The 6.5 Creedmoor (aka 6.5 CM) was initially developed for competitive long-range shooting, while the 6.8 SPC was developed by the U.S. military to increase the lethality of the AR-15 platform and replace the 5.56 NATO.
Although the 6.8 SPC is inferior to the 6.5 Creedmoor in virtually every ballistic category, it is a hard-hitting semi-auto round that is effective against whitetail and hogs at closer ranges.
This leads many new shooters to question if they should invest in a bolt-action 6.5 Creedmoor hunting rifle, or if a 6.8 SPC is good enough for their area.
In this article, we will evaluate the 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 6.8 SPC to help you understand the differences between the two and give you a clearer idea of which cartridge is better for your shooting needs.
What Is the Difference Between 6.5 Creedmoor and 6.8 SPC?
The primary differences between the 6.5 Creedmoor and 6.8 SPC are their intended rifle and use. The 6.5 Creedmoor was designed for use in bolt-action rifles for long-range shooting competitions, while the 6.8 SPC was designed to increase the power of the AR-15.
Cartridge Specs
When comparing two rifle cartridges, it’s always good to begin with their physical specifications.
Perhaps one the biggest differences between the 6.8 SPC and 6.5 Creedmoor is how they came into being and their intended purposes.
The 6.8 SPC is the elder of the two rifle cartridges, having been released in 2004 as part of a joint effort between Remington Arms, U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM), and the U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit.
The round was developed by modifying the lesser known 30 Remington cartridge to fit into a standard M4 magazine and accept a 0.277” diameter bullet.
On the other hand, the 6.5 Creedmoor was released in 2007 following a gripe session between legendary service rifle competitor Dennis DeMille and Dave Emary, the senior ballistician for Hornady at the time. The round was developed by necking down a 30 Thompson Center case to accept a 6.5mm (or 0.264”) diameter bullet.
The 6.5 Creedmoor generally fires heavier bullets. The 6.8 SPC can fire bullets weighing between 85 and 140 grains, with 110 and 115 grains being most popular. In contrast, the 6.5 Creedmoor can fire bullets weighing between 95 and 153 grains, with 120, 130, and 140 grains being most popular.
Perhaps one of the most striking differences between these two rounds is the massive difference in size. The 6.5 Creedmoor towers over the 6.8 SPC in terms of case length and overall length. The 6.5 CM case measures 1.92”. Its overall length equals 2.825”. Those figures dominate 1.687” and 2.26” for the 6.8 SPC, respectively.
Although the 6.5 CM is the longer of the two cartridges, it is still short enough to fit into a short-action rifle. This is an advantage over 6.5 Creedmoor, as short-action rifles are typically lighter and have a shorter bolt throw than standard- or long-action rifles.
The 6.5 Creedmoor has a wider case, with a base diameter of 0.470” compared to 0.422” for the 6.8 SPC.
These major differences in case dimensions mean the 6.5 Creedmoor has a substantially higher case capacity than the 6.8 SPC. The SPC has a capacity of 34.8 grains H2O, but the 6.5 CM can hold a whopping 52.5 grains. That means the 6.5 Creedmoor can hold nearly 50% more powder than the 6.8 SPC.
The final major difference between these two rounds is the maximum chamber pressure each is rated for. The 6.8 SPC can withstand 55,000 psi max pressure, while the Creedmoor can handle considerably more at 62,000 psi.
What Is the Difference Between 6.8 SPC and 6.8 SPC II?
Although the 6.8 SPC seemed to be a potent and elegant answer to the 5.56 NATO terminal performance issue, there were some problems with its implementation.
When you’re looking to purchase a new upper receiver or barrel for 6.8, you might notice that the barrel is stamped as “6.8 SPC II.” Many new shooters wonder what the difference between 6.8 SPC and 6.8 SPC II is. The answer is in the design of the chamber.
The original 6.8 SPC chamber had a design flaw that could potentially cause pressure issues. The 6.8 SPC II chamber is designed to handle full-power 6.8mm SPC loads.
In their haste to bring the 6.8 SPC to market and capitalize the hype surrounding the new round, Remington botched the release of the cartridge with inaccurate chamber design specifications.
The original chamber designs called for 0.050” of free bore. When combined with a 1:10” twist rate barrel, pressure issues began to creep up. Initial reports claimed the rounds were only around 200 psi above the maximum 55,000 psi pressure limits, but if the military learned anything from Vietnam, it was to follow specs to the letter.
Remington sought to remedy the higher pressure issue the best way they saw fit, which was to underload the ammo instead of fixing the free bore measurement. The resulting “light” 6.8 SPC ammo failed to meet expectations, and the U.S. Army scrapped the project.
In all the excitement over the new 6.8 SPC, several civilian firearm manufactures clambered to release rifles chambered in the new cartridge before SAAMI had officially standardized the 6.8 SPC. With numerous faulty rifles in circulation, the only action SAAMI could take was to sanction the round.
This is not to say that original 6.8 SPC rifles won’t function properly, but there is the potential for a critical pressure failure when using full-power rounds.
The answer was the 6.8 SPC II.
The 6.8 SPC II added an additional 0.050” of free bore to the chamber, and decreased the barrel twist rate to 1:11”. This completely resolved the pressure issues with the original design. All new rifles chambered in 6.8 SPC are technically chambered in 6.8 SPC II.
Although most factory loads will be loaded light (due to potential liability issues of original 6.8 SPC rifles still running loose in the wild), ammo for 6.8 SPC II rifles can be loaded to the full potential that the round was designed for.
To read more about the 6.8 SPC, check out these articles:
Recoil
The 6.8 SPC generally has less recoil than the 6.5 Creedmoor.
Recoil is an important consideration when purchasing a new rifle, as a round with heavy recoil will be more difficult to control and will slow your rate of follow-up shots. The potential for flinching is also an issue for cartridges with heavy recoil.
Free recoil is determined by four factors: muzzle velocity (fps), powder charge weight, bullet weight, and firearm weight.
A true apples-to-apples comparison is not possible with these rounds, as they are fired from drastically different firearms. The 6.5 CM is primarily fired from bolt-action rifles, while the 6.8 SPC is fired exclusively in the AR-15 (at the time of writing).
The test firearms for this comparison will be theThe original 6.8 SPC chamber had a design flaw that could potentially cause pressure issues. Savage 110 High Country (8.5 pounds) and the 6.8 Remington SPC LWRC Six8-A5 (7.25 pounds).
The cartridges being compared are the Hornady 6.5 Creedmoor 143 grain ELD-X (2,700 fps muzzle velocity) and Hornady 6.8 SPC 120 grain SST (2,460 fps).
In this comparison, the 6.5 Creedmoor generates around 14 ft-lbs of free recoil compared to 8 ft-lbs for the 6.8 SPC. That’s nearly a 2x difference!
It should be noted that most shooters will not have a problem controlling the recoil of either round. The 6.5 Creedmoor is considered very low recoil for the ballistic performance it offers when compared to other, higher-recoil competition rounds like the 308 Winchester or the 300 Win Mag.
However, the 6.8 SPC clearly has less recoil, and will allow for faster accurate follow-up shots than a 6.5 Creedmoor.
Muzzle Velocity, Kinetic Energy, and Trajectory
If you frequent any shooting or hunting forums, you are likely aware that proponents of the 6.5 Creedmoor proclaim the round is perfect for all your shooting needs. On the other hand, 6.8 SPC supporters point out the round’s low recoil and amazing short range terminal ballistics.
For shooters interested in detailed performance data across various bullet weights and distances, our comprehensive 6.5 Creedmoor ballistics charts provide valuable trajectory, velocity, and energy information.
For this comparison, we will analyze two popular options for each cartridge. For the 6.5 Creedmoor we will analyze the Hornady 143 grain ELD-X and Barnes127 grain LRX; for the 6.8 SPC, the Hornady 120 grain SST and Federal 115 grain SP.
The rounds will be compared out to 500 yards, with one additional data point at 800 yards to evaluate long-range trajectory.
In terms of muzzle velocity, the 6.5 Creedmoor was approximately 300-400 fps faster than both 6.8 SPC factory ammo selections. The 6.5 CM was also more efficient at conserving its velocity farther downrange. This is clearly illustrated at the 800-yard line, where both loads for the 6.5 CM were well above the speed of sound (1,125 fps), the 115 grain Fusion SP was subsonic at 1,112 fps, and the 120 grain SST was close to transonic 1,148 fps.
When it comes to kinetic energy, the 6.5 CM is the clear winner. The 143 grain ELD-X has the highest muzzle energy at 2,315 ft-lbs. The 127 grain LRX came in second at 2,250 ft-lbs. The 120 grain SST had the higher muzzle energy of the 6.8 SPC loads: 1,612 ft-lbs compared, to 1,558 ft-lbs for the 115 grain SP.
The 6.5 Creedmoor is more efficient at conserving its kinetic energy at range. For example, at 500 yards the 6.5 CM is still well above the 1,000 ft-lbs threshold needed for ethically harvesting a whitetail, while the 6.8 SPC rounds are at 619 ft-lbs and 565 ft-lbs for the 120 grain and 115 grain bullets, respectively.
The 6.5 Creedmoor is known for being incredibly flat-shooting. It earns that title when compared to the 6.8 SPC.
Out to 200 yards, all four rounds are roughly comparable. However, at 300 yards, the 6.5 Creedmoor starts to pull away. By 400 yards the 6.5 and 6.8 bullets are separated by over a foot difference in bullet drop.
At the 500-yard marker the two 6.5 CM bullets exhibit -53” and -54” of bullet drop, while the two 6.8 rounds have -78” and -80” of bullet drop. The difference becomes even more pronounced at 800 yards, where the 127 grain LRX has -188” of bullet drop and the 143 grain ELD-X has -181”. Compare that to -290” for the 120 grain SST and -300” for the 115 grain SP 6.8 SPC rounds.
Looking at this ballistic data, what conclusions can we draw?
The 6.5 Creedmoor ballistics clearly show how the round was designed for long-distance target shooting. The 6.5 has a very flat trajectory, and launches projectiles that are effective at retaining kinetic energy and velocity at distance. That gives the 6.5 Creedmoor a longer effective range than the 6.8 SPC.
On the other hand, the 6.8 SPC seems to excel at shorter ranges, where it has nearly 40% more kinetic energy than a 5.56 NATO round. The 6.8 SPC has the added benefit of being fired from the semi-auto AR-15, while the 6.5 CM is typically fired from a bolt-action rifle (though semi-autos, such as the AR-10, aren’t remotely unheard of). This means that follow-up shots will generally be faster from a 6.8.
Ballistic Coefficient and Sectional Density
The 6.5 Creedmoor generally a higher ballistic coefficient and sectional density than comparable 6.8 SPC factory ammo.
Ballistic coefficient (BC) is a measure of how aerodynamic a bullet is and how well it will resist wind drift. Sectional density (SD) is a way to evaluate the penetration ability of a bullet based on its diameter and weight.
The 6.5mm bullet design is known for being incredibly aerodynamic and sleek. This was one of the main reasons why Hornady decided on a 6.5mm bullet for the Creedmoor.
To be fair, the 6.8mm bullets used by the SPC are very aerodynamic as well. However, due to the overall length limitations of the AR-15 chamber, the 0.277” diameter bullets used by the 6.8 SPC are not as sleek as they potentially could be, which negatively affects their BC.
For the 6.5 Creedmoor, the 143 grain ELD-X has the highest BC of 0.625, while the 127 grain LRX measures in at a respectable 0.468. The 6.8 bullets analyzed have a lower BC: the 120 grain SST has a BC of 0.400, while the 115 grain SP equals 0.378.
The 6.5mm bullets will often have higher SD values as they focus their kinetic energy into a smaller cross-sectional area. The 6.5 CM 143 grain bullet has the highest SD of 0.293, while the 6.8 120 grain SST has a SD of 0.223.
To summarize, the 6.5 CM is more resistant to wind drift thanks to its higher BC bullets. This is ideal for shooting across longer ranges where wind drift can seriously affect the flight path of a bullet.
Even though the 6.5 generally has higher SD values than the 6.8, both rounds have more than enough penetration capability for large game like whitetail, antelope, hog, and pronghorn within their effective ranges.
Hunting
When it comes to medium game hunting, the 6.5 Creedmoor and 6.8 SPC are both excellent options within their effective ranges.
There is little question that the 6.5 Creedmoor offers deer hunters a considerably longer effective range. Most shooters would agree that the 6.8 has about a 200-yard effective range for whitetail, while the 6.5 Creedmoor can have triple that with proper hunting bullets.
Make sure you are stocked full of Hornady 6.5 Creedmoor ammo for hunting season this fall!
Obviously, this is a big selling point for the 6.5 Creedmoor. However, many hunters in the New England, the Midwest, and Pacific Northwest often find that their hunting conditions don’t require such a long-range round. When hunting for whitetail in thick brush or densely wooded areas, most shots will be taken within 150 yards or less. That means that there is little benefit to upgrading to a 6.5.
Furthermore, the 6.8 SPC was developed to function in a shorter barrel, such as that used in the M4 carbine. Typically, shorter barrels lead to losses in muzzle velocity – although ballistic testing suggests that very little muzzle velocity is gained by firing the 6.8 in anything longer than a 16” barrel.
S 6.8 SPC carbine with a 16” barrel can be a handy hunting rifle that is lightweight and capable of semi-auto fire. This is one reason why the 6.8 SPC has become extremely popular with hog hunters in Southern states.
However, if you plan on hunting mule deer or pronghorn on the Great Plains, then the 6.5 Creedmoor clearly makes the better choice. Superior 6.5 Creedmoor ballistics cannot be ignored when taking a long-range shot, when need to ensure you have enough kinetic energy to ethically harvest the animal at range.
Both cartridges have lower bullet weight options available for varmint hunting. Most varmint hunters would agree that the 6.5 and 6.8 are best suited for coyote-sized varmints. There’s nothing saying you can’t use a 6.5 or a 6.8 for smaller game like prairie dogs and woodchucks, but a smaller cartridge like a 223 Remington or 22-250 is typically preferred for these varmints.
For big game like elk, the 6.5 Creedmoor is the only option. The 6.8 SPC lacks the kinetic energy needed to take down such large game. It’s important to note that a 6.5 CM can only be used on elk at a maximum range of around 200 to 300 yards, depending on your load. This is why most elk hunters prefer a more powerful cartridge like the 28 Nosler or 300 Win Mag.
Ammo and Rifle Cost/Availability
The 6.5 Creedmoor cannot be beat when it comes to ammo availability and rifle options, as it has become the most popular 6.5mm caliber cartridge on the market. The botched launch of the 6.8 SPC gave some ammo and rifle manufacturers pause, which is one reason for its less-than-stellar commercial success so far.
The popularity of the 6.5 CM and ammo availability cannot be understated.
The 6.5 Creedmoor offers shooters an extreme amount of versatility. There are lighter rounds for varmints, plus plenty of heavier ones that can easily take down whitetail or win your next long-range precision rifle competition.
Virtually every ammo manufacturer, including Hornady, Winchester, Remington, Norma, Berger, Barnes, Federal and Browning, has some version of 6.5 Creedmoor hunting ammo available. Although there are considerably more varieties of 6.5 CM factory ammo available, there are still plenty of options for 6.8 SPC from Winchester, Remington, Hornady, Federal, Nosler, and Silver State Armory.
The 6.5 CM and 6.8 SPC are essentially equivalent in terms of ammo cost. Generally, less expensive practice ammo will go for around $1.20/round and premium hunting ammo costing between $2-3.50/round for both cartridges.
Speaking of cost, make sure to check out our stock of Hornady 6.5 Creedmoor.
Entry-level 6.5 CM bolt-action rifles like the Ruger American and Savage Axis can be had for under $500, while hunting rifles like a Browning X-Bolt, Savage 110, and Winchester Model 70 can be had for a bit more.
For PRS competitive shooters, the Ruger Precision Rifle and Savage 110 Precision are two out of the box long-range rifles ready for the 1,000 yard line. Semi-automatic options for the 6.5 CM are also available in the FN SCAR, Springfield Armory M1A, and AR-10 pattern rifles.
As the 6.8 SPC was built for the AR-15 platform, it means that any AR on the market is a potential host for it. All that is required for a conversion is a new barrel, bolt, and magazine. If you’re in the market for an upper receiver or a completed rifle, there are plenty of configurations available from LWRC, Wilson Combat, Stag Arms, Rock River Arms, and Daniel Defense.
The AR-15 is currently the only host for the 6.8 SPC. However, the Bushmaster ACR and Ruger Mini-14 were both chambered for it in the past. Ruger discontinued production of their 6.8 version of the Mini-14 in 2012, while Bushmaster ceased production of the ACR in 2020. Both rifles are incredibly rare and expensive – if you can find one.
There are currently no bolt-action or single-shot rifles available for 6.8 SPC.
Reloading
Reloading is one method shooters use to reduce their overall cost per round and increase the consistency of their ammo to sub-MOA levels. Furthermore, handloads can be tailored to your rifle to meet your specific shooting needs.
Bullets for 6.5mm are relatively easy to come by. This bullet is also fired in the 6.5 Grendel, 6.5x55 Swiss, 264 Win Mag, 260 Remington, 6.5-.284 Norma, and 6.5 PRC. Speaking of the 6.5 Grendel, those comparing AR-15 cartridge options should read our comprehensive 6.8 SPC vs. 6.5 Grendel comparison to understand how these two popular alternatives stack up.
The 0.277” diameter bullet fired by the 6.8 SPC is extremely popular. It is also used in the 270 Winchester, 270 WSM, 270 Weatherby Magnum, and the new 277 SIG Fury.
This means that if you make handloads for one of these cartridges, you’ll be able to stockpile bullets for any of the others that share the same bullet diameter.
Brass is relatively easy to come by for both cartridges, but the 6.5 Creedmoor will have a slight edge in availability thanks to its widespread popularity.
Making your own handloads for the 6.8 SPC also means you will be able to unleash the full potential of the cartridge (provided your firearm has a SPC II chamber). For the 6.5 Creedmoor, reloading allows shooters to achieve the utmost levels of precision, consistency, and accuracy that the 6.5 can offer.
Final Shots: 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 6.8 SPC
The 6.5 Creedmoor and 6.8 SPC are two rifle cartridges with extremely different intended purposes.
The 6.8 Remington SPC is an excellent self-defense and short-range hunting round designed for the AR-15 rifle. As a true intermediate cartridge, the 6.8 offers shooters impressive short-ange ballistics that are excellent for hunting in thick brush or engaging close range targets.
The 6.5 Creedmoor is one of the most successful long-range cartridges developed in the 21st century. It has low recoil for the power that it offers, and an impressively flat trajectory. Although initially developed for shooting competitions, the 6.5 Creedmoor has successfully transitioned into the hunting world and makes for a potent long-range deer hunting cartridge.
Deciding between the 6.8 SPC vs. 6.5 Creedmoor depends primarily on the distances you expect to shoot. If you plan on shooting past 300 yards, then the 6.5 Creedmoor is clearly the obvious choice. However, if you plan to take all your shots within 300 yards and want a cartridge for both home defense and hunting, then the 6.8 SPC deserves a look.
No matter which cartridge you choose, make sure you stock up on ammunition here at Ammo.com. I’ll see you on the range!
Ammo Comparisons
- .308 vs 5.56
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs .308
- .300 Blackout vs .308
- .300 Win Mag vs .308
- .243 vs .308
- .308 vs .30-06
- 7mm-08 vs .308
- .270 vs .308
- 7.62x39 vs .308
- .223 vs .308
- .338 Lapua vs .308
- .380 ACP vs 9mm
- .223 vs 5.56
- .300 Blackout vs 5.56
- 9mm vs 45 ACP
- 9mm vs 40 S&W
- .357 SIG vs 9mm
- 10mm vs 9mm
- 9mm vs 9mm Luger
- .243 vs .270
- .300 Win Mag vs .30-06
- .270 vs .30-06
- .40 vs .45
- 38 Special vs 357
- 9mm vs 40 vs 45
- 5.56 vs 7.62x39
- 338 Lapua vs .30-06
- .30-30 vs .30-06
- 300 PRC vs 338 Lapua
- .30-06 vs 7mm
- 300 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua
- 300 PRC vs 300 Win Mag
- 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag
- 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua
- 12 Gauge vs 20 Gauge
- 10mm vs 357 Mag
- .30-30 vs 7.62x39
- 224 Valkyrie vs 22-250
- 17 HMR vs 22 Mag
- 7.62x39 vs .300 Blackout
- 45 ACP vs 45 Auto
- 45-70 vs 30-30
- 300 Blackout vs 223
- 357 Magnum vs 9mm
- 350 Legend vs 300 Blackout
- 224 Valkyrie vs 223
- 45 ACP vs 38 Super
- 6.5 Grendel vs .308
- 17 HMR vs 22 LR
- 10 Gauge vs 12 Gauge
- 22-250 vs 223
- 45 Colt vs 45 ACP
- 350 Legend vs 30-30
- 5.7x28 vs 223
- 5.7 vs 9mm
- 5.56 vs 5.7
- 22 vs 9mm
- Buckshot vs Birdshot
- 450 Bushmaster vs 308
- 450 Bushmaster vs 223
- Buckshot vs Slug
- 6.5 Grendel vs 5.56
- 6mm ARC vs 6.5 Grendel
- 44 vs 45
- 458 SOCOM vs 5.56
- 357 vs 44
- 32 ACP vs 380
- 300 Win Mag vs 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua Mag
- 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM vs 50 Beowulf
- 6mm Creedmoor vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- TMJ vs FMJ
- 44 Special Vs 44 Magnum
- 45 90 vs 45 70
- 6.8 Western vs 6.8 SPC
- 50 Beowulf vs 50 BMG
- 26 Nosler vs 6.5 PRC
- 28 Gauge vs 410
- 6.8 SPC vs 5.56
- 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel
- 6.8 Western vs 7mm Rem Mag vs .28 Nosler
- 6.8 Western vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 22 Hornet vs 223
- 6.8 Western vs 6.5 PRC
- .410 vs 12 Gauge
- .410 vs 20 Gauge
- 22 LR vs 22 Mag
- 6mm ARC vs 243
- 7mm-08 vs 270
- 243 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- Nickel vs Brass Casing
- 204 Ruger vs 223
- 50 Beowulf vs 5.56
- 260 Remington vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 6mm Remington vs 243
- 28 Nosler vs 300 PRC
- 50 Beowulf vs 50 AE
- 22 Nosler vs 22-250
- 450 Marlin vs 45-70
- 300 Win Mag vs 300 Norma
- 458 SOCOM vs 300 Blackout
- 38-55 vs 45-70
- 22 Hornet vs 22 LR
- 300 Norma vs 338 Lapua
- 338 Lapua vs 50 BMG
- 28 Nosler vs 300 Win Mag
- 28 Nosler vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 204 vs 22-250
- 458 SOCOM vs 45 70
- 44 40 vs 45 70
- 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 450 Bushmaster vs 30-06
- 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag
- 30 Carbine vs 223
- 25-06 vs 30-06
- 26 Nosler vs 28 Nosler
- 16ga vs 12ga
- 30 06 vs 7.62 x54R
- 9mm Makarov vs 9mm Luger
- 350 Legend vs 223
- 30 Carbine vs 5.56
- 6.5x55 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs 270
- M193 vs M855
- 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM
- 6.5 Grendel vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 350 Legend vs 5.56
- .277 Fury vs 6.8 SPC
- 277 Fury vs 300 Win Mag
- 10mm vs .45 ACP
- 277 Fury vs 223
- 6.8 SPC vs 300 Blackout
- 6.5 PRC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 277 Fury vs 308
- 277 Fury vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 350 Legend vs 450 Bushmaster
- 277 Fury Vs 5.56 NATO
- 10mm vs 40S&W
- 32 ACP vs 9mm
- 32 Special vs 9mm
- 8.6 Blackout vs 300 Blackout
- 30 Super Carry vs. 9mm
- 5.56 vs 9mm
- .50 Action Express vs 9mm
- 7.62x25 vs. 9mm
- 10mm vs 44 Magnum
- 300 Blackout vs 300 Win Mag
- 6.5 Grendel vs 300 Blackout
- 460 Rowland vs 10mm
- 300 RUM vs 300 PRC
- 300 Norma vs 300 PRC
- 45 GAP vs 45 ACP
- 7mm PRC vs 300 Win Mag
- 300 PRC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 300 PRC vs 308
- 357 SIG vs 357 Mag
- 7.62x39 vs 7.62x51
- 243 Win vs 223 Rem
- 30 Nosler vs 300 PRC
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 30-06 Springfield
- 450 S&W vs. 44 Magnum
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 300 Win Mag
- 454 Cassull vs. 45-70 Govt
- 454 Cassull vs. 44 Mag
- 7.62x54r vs. 308 Winchester
- 22 ARC vs. 223 Rem
- Subsonic vs. Supersonic Ammo
- Hornady Critical Defense vs. Critical Duty
- 45 Colt vs. 45 Long Colt
- 25 ACP vs. 22 LR
- 45 Long Colt vs. 44 Magnum
- 38 Special vs. 38 S&W
- 44 Special vs. 357 Magnum
- 5.45 vs. 5.56
- 38 Special vs. 380 ACP
- 30-06 vs. 5.56
- 6mm ARC vs. 5.56 NATO
- 38 Super vs. 9mm
- 22 ARC vs. 6mm ARC
- 408 CheyTac vs. 50 BMG
- 44 Special vs. 45 ACP
- 380 ACP vs. 45 ACP
- 22 LR vs. 223 Rem
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 223 Rem
- 25 ACP vs. 9mm
- 357 Magnum vs. 45 ACP
- 28 Gauge vs. 20 Gauge