6.5 Grendel vs 6.5 Creedmoor: Which Is Right for You?
Although it took us Americans a while to admit it, European hunters have long known that 6.5mm projectiles are among the most aerodynamic and accurate for long-range shooting.
Two 6.5mm rifle cartridges that have recently burst onto the North American shooting scene are the 6.5 Creedmoor and 6.5 Grendel.
Although both rounds fire the same 0.264” diameter bullet, I’ve found that they differ in their application. The 6.5 Grendel is designed to get the most out of the AR-15 platform, whereas the 6.5 Creedmoor was developed for long-range shooting competitions.
In this article we will examine the differences between these two all-star 6.5mm rifle cartridges, and help you determine which round is better for your intended purpose.
What’s the Difference Between 6.5 Grendel and 6.5 Creedmoor?
The primary difference between the 6.5 Grendel and 6.5 Creedmoor is the rifles they were designed for. The 6.5 Grendel was designed to enhance the AR-15 platform’s lethality, while the 6.5 Creedmoor was designed for bolt-action rifles in long-range shooting competitions.
Cartridge Specs
When evaluating centerfire cartridges, it’s good to begin by analyzing their specs.
The 6.5 Creedmoor is also called the 6.5 CM or 6.5 Creed (its full name is often misspelled as “Creedmore”). It was developed by necking down a 30 Thompson Center case to accept a 6.5mm (or 0.264”) diameter bullet.
The 6.5 Grendel was designed to outperform the 5.56 NATO/223 Remington cartridge, and introduced in 2003 as a new chambering for the AR-15 rifle. Developed by Bill Alexander of Alexander Arms (who also brought us the 50 Beowulf), the 6.5 Grendel descended from the 6.5mm PPC case (itself a descendent of the 220 Russian, which is a round that had been adapted from the 7.62x39).
Although the 6.5 Creedmoor and 6.5 Grendel fire the same 0.264” diameter bullets, they are drastically different in size.
The 6.5 Grendel was designed with NATO-spec STANAG magazines in mind, which limits cartridges to a maximum overall length of 2.260”. On the other hand, the 6.5 Creedmoor was developed for bolt-action rifles. It wasn’t bound by the same STANAG limitation and accordingly stands over half an inch taller at 2.825”.
That massive difference in case length plays directly into case capacity. The 6.5 Creedmoor can hold a sizable 52.5 grains of H2O, while the Grendel round tops off at 35 grains of H2O. The 6.5 Creedmoor case is also capable of handling higher chamber pressure: 62,000 psi, compared to 52,000 psi for the 6.5 Grendel (per SAAMI specs).
As I’m sure you can imagine, the larger quantity of propellant and higher pressure the 6.5 Creedmoor case can contain significantly boost its ballistic performance over that of the 6.5 Grendel.
The 6.5 Creedmoor’s higher case capacity also enables it to fire heavier bullets. The 6.5 Creedmoor can fire bullets weighing 95 to 160 grains, with 120, 130, and 140 grain bullets being the most prevalent.
The 6.5 Grendel can fire bullets weighing between 90 and 130 grains, with 100, 110, 120, and 123 grain offerings being most popular.
| Spec | 6.5 Grendel | 6.5 Creedmoor |
|---|---|---|
| Parent Case | 6.5mm PPC | 30 Thompson Center |
| Bullet Diameter | 0.264” | 0.264” |
| Neck Diameter | 0.293” | 0.295” |
| Base Diameter | 0.439” | 0.470” |
| Case Length | 1.520” | 1.920” |
| Overall Length | 2.260” | 2.825” |
| Case Capacity | 35 grains H2O | 52.5 grains H2O |
| Max Pressure (SAAMI) | 52,000 psi | 62,000 psi |
Recoil
The 6.5 Creedmoor generally has more recoil than the 6.5 Grendel. The 6.5 Creedmoor generates an average of 13 to 18 ft-lbs of free recoil energy, whereas the 6.5 Grendel produces 6 to 11 ft-lbs.
Recoil is an important consideration when purchasing a new rifle, as a round with heavy recoil is more difficult to control and slows your rate of accurate follow-up shots.
Free recoil energy is determined by four factors: muzzle velocity (feet per second; fps), propellant charge weight, bullet weight, and firearm weight.
To illustrate, we will compare two cartridges: Hornady 6.5 Creedmoor 143 grain ELD-X (2,700 fps muzzle velocity) and Hornady 6.5 Grendel 123 grain SST (2,500 fps). In the interest of providing the most apples-to-apples comparison possible, we’ll assume we are firing a 6.6 pound Ruger American Rifle Predator, as it is a bolt-action rifle commonly chambered for either cartridge.
Given these parameters, the 6.5 Creedmoor produces 17 ft-lbs of free recoil energy; over 50% more than the 6.5 Grendel at 11 ft-lbs.
Considering the 6.5 Creedmoor has nearly 50% more case capacity than the 6.5 Grendel, it should come as no surprise that it has substantially more recoil to match.
Muzzle Velocity, Kinetic Energy, and Trajectory
While it may slap the shoulder a bit harder than the 6.5 Grendel, the 6.5 Creedmoor compensates by providing superior long-range ballistic performance.
But how much better is it, really? Let’s see!
For this comparison, we will select two pairs of each cartridge. For the 6.5 Grendel, they are Hornady 123 grain SST and Federal 130 grain Berger Tactical Hybrid Match. For the 6.5 Creedmoor, Hornady 147 grain ELD-M and Berger 156 grain Elite Hunter.
If you’re in the market for some 6.5 Creedmoor ammo, make sure to check out our wide selection of Hornady 6.5 Creedmoor ammo on sale and in stock!
All of these rounds are suitable for shooting longer distances, though a 100-yard zero was assumed. Data at 800 and 1,000 yards were included to illustrate the long-range shooting capabilities of each cartridge.
| Range (yds) | 6.5 Grendel 123 gr Hornady SST | 6.5 Grendel 130 gr Federal Berger Tactical Hybrid Match | 6.5 Creedmoor 147 gr Hornady ELD-M | 6.5 Creedmoor 156 gr Berger Elite Hunter | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V (fps) | E (ft-lbs) | Drop (in) | V (fps) | E (ft-lbs) | Drop (in) | V (fps) | E (ft-lbs) | Drop (in) | V (fps) | E (ft-lbs) | Drop (in) | |
| 0 | 2580 | 1818 | -1.5 | 2400 | 1663 | -1.5 | 2695 | 2371 | -1.5 | 2680 | 2488 | -1.5 |
| 100 | 2410 | 1587 | 0 | 2251 | 1463 | 0 | 2567 | 2151 | 0 | 2549 | 2251 | 0 |
| 200 | 2247 | 1379 | -4.5 | 2108 | 1283 | -5.4 | 2443 | 1947 | -3.8 | 2422 | 2032 | -3.9 |
| 300 | 2090 | 1193 | -15.9 | 1970 | 1120 | -18.6 | 2322 | 1759 | -13.4 | 2299 | 1830 | -13.7 |
| 400 | 1940 | 1028 | -35.3 | 1838 | 975 | -40.8 | 2204 | 1586 | -29.5 | 2179 | 1644 | -30 |
| 500 | 1796 | 881 | -63.9 | 1712 | 846 | -73.3 | 2090 | 1426 | -52.7 | 2062 | 1473 | -53.8 |
| 800 | 1417 | 548 | -222.3 | 1379 | 549 | -249.8 | 1769 | 1022 | -174 | 1736 | 1044 | -178 |
| 1000 | 1219 | 406 | -411.1 | 1204 | 419 | -455.6 | 1577 | 811 | -308.8 | 1542 | 824 | -316.8 |
All of these cartridges are relatively close to one another in terms of muzzle velocity, with the 6.5 Creedmoor exhibiting around a 100-200 fps advantage over the 6.5 Grendel.
However, it’s crucial to note that the 6.5 Creedmoor fires heavier bullets. Although the two rounds are close to one another in terms of muzzle velocity, the 6.5 Creedmoor simply dominates the 6.5 Grendel in terms of kinetic energy (a function of muzzle velocity and bullet weight). Both 6.5 Creedmoor cartridges pack over 2,300 ft-lbs of muzzle energy, while the 6.5 Grendel rounds hovered between 1,600 and 1,800 ft-lbs.
The difference between these two rounds in terms of kinetic energy is significant, but it’s important to recall the 6.5 Grendel’s stated purpose: improving ballistic performance of the AR-15 platform. It delivers nearly 50% greater kinetic energy than the 5.56 NATO/223 Rem cartridge, which is very impressive. Although far more powerful, the 6.5 Creedmoor’s incompatibility with the AR-15 platform precludes it from comparison to the 5.56 NATO. It requires a heavier and more expensive AR-10 rifle!
The 6.5 Grendel’s lower power also reveals itself when we compare its trajectory against the 6.5 Creedmoor’s. Both perform nearly identically out to 300 yards, with about 15” of bullet drop on average across all four comparison rounds. However, past 400 yards, the 6.5 Creedmoor starts to pull away as its heavier projectiles maintain their velocity more efficiently than the 6.5 Grendel’s lighter ones.
At 1,000 yards, the 6.5 Grendel drops over 100” farther than the 6.5 Creedmoor, which is why the latter is much more effective for long-distance shooting applications.
So, what can we learn from all of this?
From a ballistic standpoint, the 6.5 Creedmoor is clearly the superior choice. It has considerably more muzzle energy, and a flatter trajectory to longer ranges. Although the 6.5 Grendel packs a lot of power into the AR-15 platform, its smaller case capacity and lighter bullets cannot keep pace with the 6.5 Creedmoor.
Ballistic Coefficient and Sectional Density
Ballistic coefficient (BC) is a measure of how aerodynamic a bullet is and how well it resists wind deflection. Sectional density (SD) is a measurement of a bullet’s capacity for penetration based on its diameter and weight.
Typically, longer and heavier bullets have a higher BC because they resist wind drift more effectively: something the sleek 6.5mm bullet is highly regarded for.
Both cartridges fire the same 6.5mm bullets. But because the 6.5 Creedmoor can fire heavier bullets, it generally has a slight advantage in ballistic coefficient and sectional density.
For context, here are BC and SD data for the bullets referenced in the previous section:
- 6.5 Creedmoor 147 grain ELD-M: 0.697 G1 BC, 0.301 SD
- 6.5 Creedmoor 156 grain Elite Hunter: 0.679 G1 BC, 0.320 SD
- 6.5 Grendel 123 grain SST: 0.510 G1 BC, 0.252 SD
- 6.5 Grendel 130 grain Tactical Hybrid Match: 0.560 G1 BC, 0.266 SD
6.5 Grendel vs. 6.5 Creedmoor for Hunting
Although neither were designed for hunting, the 6.5 Grendel and 6.5 Creedmoor have both been pressed into this role with relative success.
There’s no question that both of these rounds are extremely effective against whitetail, pronghorn, hogs, and all other medium game.
The question comes down to effective range.
6.5 Grendel vs. 6.5 Creedmoor for Deer Hunting
For whitetail, the general consensus in the hunting community is that an ethical harvest requires 1,000 ft-lbs of striking energy.
With this in mind, the 6.5 Grendel has approximately 400-yard effective range for deer hunting compared to 800 yards for the 6.5 Creedmoor. That is a massive difference, but the real question is this: Do you really need all that range?
Most would agree that if you plan to hunt in heavily forested areas like those in the Midwest, New England, or Pacific Northwest, you won’t be taking shots over 400 yards very frequently. In my home state of Indiana, it’s rare to even have the opportunity to take a shot over 250 yards due to the terrain.
Under those conditions, there’s no real advantage to the 6.5 Creedmoor’s long-range supremacy. If you live in an area where longer range shots are commonplace, like the Great Plains, then the 6.5 Creedmoor starts making a lot more sense.
Picking the best round for hunting really comes down to understanding your area and the range you’ll reasonably be able to engage a game animal over.
6.5 Creedmoor for Elk and Other Big Game Hunting
When it comes to big game hunting, the 6.5 Creedmoor is the only option. The 6.5 Grendel simply lacks the energy needed to take down larger critters. For example, most hunters agree it requires 1,500 ft-lbs of energy to ethically harvest an elk. The 6.5 Grendel barely has that at the muzzle!
6.5 Grendel for Coyote and Varmint Hunting
Both rounds do exceptionally well at varmint hunting. That being said, the 6.5 Creedmoor’s heavier bullets aren’t really necessary for small critters like coyotes and groundhogs. That and the semi-automatic capability of the 6.5 Grendel make it the better varmint hunting option.
So, where do we stand on both of these awesome 6.5mm cartridges?
The 6.5 Grendel is a lower-recoil option that is great within 400 yards, and designed for the extremely popular semi-automatic AR-15 platform. It is awesome for engaging multiple targets (like hogs or smaller varmints) and fast follow-up shots.
The 6.5 Creedmoor is a considerably more powerful round that can be used to harvest game animals as large as elk. It has significantly more recoil and is predominantly restricted to bolt-action rifles, although semi-auto 6.5 Creedmoor AR-10s are becoming more common.
If you don’t expect to hunt anything larger than whitetail within 400 yards, then the 6.5 Grendel is a great option. If you need more range or want to hunt elk someday, go with the 6.5 Creedmoor.
Ammo and Rifle Cost/Availability
Like it or not, the 6.5 Creedmoor is unquestionably the most successful cartridge introduced since the turn of the 21st century. As such, considerably more 6.5 Creedmoor factory loads are available than 6.5 Grendel at the time of writing. The 6.5 Creedmoor holds about a 6:1 advantage over the 6.5 Grendel in terms of different factory loads on the market. Both rounds are close in terms of price, although 6.5 Creedmoor practice and precision ammo are slightly cheaper.
Plenty of rifles are available chambered for either cartridge. Due to its popularity, the 6.5 Creedmoor seems to be loaded into virtually every bolt-action rifle configuration imaginable. Take your pick from all the major manufacturers like Browning, Remington, Ruger, Savage, Weatherby, and Winchester. They all offer multiple bolt-action rifles chambered for 6.5 Creedmoor.
If you want a semi-automatic 6.5 Creedmoor, you have a few options. The most popular is the AR-10. It typically fires 308 Winchester, but can easily be built or converted to fire 6.5 Creedmoor. If you’ve got deep pockets, you can get a Springfield M1A or FN SCAR 20S chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor.
The 6.5 Grendel is not as popular an AR-15 intermediate cartridge as the 300 AAC Blackout or 6.8 SPC, although ARs chambered for it are readily available. (Those curious about how the 6.5 Grendel compares to the 6.8 SPC should read our detailed 6.8 SPC vs. 6.5 Grendel comparison.) If you’re in the market for a bolt-action 6.5 Grendel, you are limited to CZ, Howa, or Ruger. However, most shooters who want a 6.5 Grendel rifle prefer it in the modular AR platform.
6.5 Creedmoor Ballistic Chart
The Ammo.com experts have assembled ballistic data for various factory-loaded 6.5 Creedmoor ammo options. For a more comprehensive breakdown of 6.5 Creedmoor ballistics, including detailed trajectory analyses across different loads and environmental conditions, check out our dedicated ballistics resource page.
Note: This information comes from ammo manufacturers. Actual ballistics obtained with your firearm can vary considerably from advertised ballistics. Also, ballistics can vary from lot to lot with the same brand and type load.
| Bullet Weight | Velocity (fps) | Energy (ft-lbs) | Trajectory (in) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muzzle | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | Muzzle | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | |
| 120 Grain | 3020 | 2815 | 2619 | 2430 | 2251 | 2430 | 2111 | 1827 | 1574 | 1350 | 1.4 | 0 | -6.5 | -18.9 |
| 120 Grain | 3050 | 2850 | 2659 | 2476 | 2300 | 2479 | 2164 | 1884 | 1634 | 1310 | 1.4 | 0 | -6.3 | -18.3 |
| 129 Grain Superformance | 2950 | 2756 | 2570 | 2392 | 2221 | 2492 | 2175 | 1892 | 1639 | 1417 | 1.5 | 0 | -6.8 | -19.7 |
| 140 Grain | 2550 | 2380 | 2217 | 2060 | 1910 | 2021 | 1761 | 1527 | 1319 | 1134 | 2.3 | 0 | -9.4 | -27 |
| 140 Grain | 2710 | 2557 | 2410 | 2267 | 2129 | 2283 | 2033 | 1805 | 1598 | 1410 | 1.9 | 0 | -7.9 | -22.6 |
| 140 Grain | 2820 | 2654 | 2494 | 2339 | 2190 | 2472 | 2179 | 1915 | 1679 | 1467 | 1.7 | 0 | -7.2 | -20.6 |
6.5 Grendel Ballistic Chart
The Ammo.com experts have also assembled ballistic data for various 6.5 Grendel factory-loaded ammo! For a more comprehensive breakdown of 6.5 Grendel ballistics, including detailed trajectory analyses across different loads and environmental conditions, check out our dedicated ballistics resource page.
Note: This information comes from ammo manufacturers. Actual ballistics obtained with your firearm can vary considerably from advertised ballistics. Also, ballistics can vary from lot to lot with the same brand and type load.
| Bullet Weight | Velocity (fps) | Energy (ft-lbs) | Trajectory (in) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muzzle | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | Muzzle | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | |
| 123 Grain | 2590 | 2420 | 2256 | 2099 | 1948 | 1832 | 1599 | 1390 | 1203 | 1037 | 1.8 | 0 | -8.6 | -25.1 |
The Verdict: 6.5 Grendel vs. 6.5 Creedmoor
The 6.5 Creedmoor and 6.5 Grendel are two premier 6.5mm rifle cartridges that represent what European hunters have known for over a century: 6.5mm bullets are awesome!
Deciding which cartridge you should select for your new rifle really depends on what you want to accomplish.
For big game hunting, the 6.5 Creedmoor is clearly the better choice, as it offers superior ballistic performance due to its higher case capacity. However, if you want to upgrade the stopping power of your AR-15 for deer hunting – or make a semi-automatic long-range precision rig – then the 6.5 Grendel makes more sense. Regardless of which one you choose, make sure you get all your ammo from Ammo.com. I’ll see you out on the range!
Ammo Comparisons
- .308 vs 5.56
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs .308
- .300 Blackout vs .308
- .300 Win Mag vs .308
- .243 vs .308
- .308 vs .30-06
- 7mm-08 vs .308
- .270 vs .308
- 7.62x39 vs .308
- .223 vs .308
- .338 Lapua vs .308
- .380 ACP vs 9mm
- .223 vs 5.56
- .300 Blackout vs 5.56
- 9mm vs 45 ACP
- 9mm vs 40 S&W
- .357 SIG vs 9mm
- 10mm vs 9mm
- 9mm vs 9mm Luger
- .243 vs .270
- .300 Win Mag vs .30-06
- .270 vs .30-06
- .40 vs .45
- 38 Special vs 357
- 9mm vs 40 vs 45
- 5.56 vs 7.62x39
- 338 Lapua vs .30-06
- .30-30 vs .30-06
- 300 PRC vs 338 Lapua
- .30-06 vs 7mm
- 300 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua
- 300 PRC vs 300 Win Mag
- 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag
- 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua
- 12 Gauge vs 20 Gauge
- 10mm vs 357 Mag
- .30-30 vs 7.62x39
- 224 Valkyrie vs 22-250
- 17 HMR vs 22 Mag
- 7.62x39 vs .300 Blackout
- 45 ACP vs 45 Auto
- 45-70 vs 30-30
- 300 Blackout vs 223
- 357 Magnum vs 9mm
- 350 Legend vs 300 Blackout
- 224 Valkyrie vs 223
- 45 ACP vs 38 Super
- 6.5 Grendel vs .308
- 17 HMR vs 22 LR
- 10 Gauge vs 12 Gauge
- 22-250 vs 223
- 45 Colt vs 45 ACP
- 350 Legend vs 30-30
- 5.7x28 vs 223
- 5.7 vs 9mm
- 5.56 vs 5.7
- 22 vs 9mm
- Buckshot vs Birdshot
- 450 Bushmaster vs 308
- 450 Bushmaster vs 223
- Buckshot vs Slug
- 6.5 Grendel vs 5.56
- 6mm ARC vs 6.5 Grendel
- 44 vs 45
- 458 SOCOM vs 5.56
- 357 vs 44
- 32 ACP vs 380
- 300 Win Mag vs 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua Mag
- 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM vs 50 Beowulf
- 6mm Creedmoor vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- TMJ vs FMJ
- 44 Special Vs 44 Magnum
- 45 90 vs 45 70
- 6.8 Western vs 6.8 SPC
- 50 Beowulf vs 50 BMG
- 26 Nosler vs 6.5 PRC
- 28 Gauge vs 410
- 6.8 SPC vs 5.56
- 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel
- 6.8 Western vs 7mm Rem Mag vs .28 Nosler
- 6.8 Western vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 22 Hornet vs 223
- 6.8 Western vs 6.5 PRC
- .410 vs 12 Gauge
- .410 vs 20 Gauge
- 22 LR vs 22 Mag
- 6mm ARC vs 243
- 7mm-08 vs 270
- 243 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- Nickel vs Brass Casing
- 204 Ruger vs 223
- 50 Beowulf vs 5.56
- 260 Remington vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 6mm Remington vs 243
- 28 Nosler vs 300 PRC
- 50 Beowulf vs 50 AE
- 22 Nosler vs 22-250
- 450 Marlin vs 45-70
- 300 Win Mag vs 300 Norma
- 458 SOCOM vs 300 Blackout
- 38-55 vs 45-70
- 22 Hornet vs 22 LR
- 300 Norma vs 338 Lapua
- 338 Lapua vs 50 BMG
- 28 Nosler vs 300 Win Mag
- 28 Nosler vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 204 vs 22-250
- 458 SOCOM vs 45 70
- 44 40 vs 45 70
- 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 450 Bushmaster vs 30-06
- 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag
- 30 Carbine vs 223
- 25-06 vs 30-06
- 26 Nosler vs 28 Nosler
- 16ga vs 12ga
- 30 06 vs 7.62 x54R
- 9mm Makarov vs 9mm Luger
- 350 Legend vs 223
- 30 Carbine vs 5.56
- 6.5x55 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs 270
- M193 vs M855
- 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM
- 6.5 Grendel vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 350 Legend vs 5.56
- .277 Fury vs 6.8 SPC
- 277 Fury vs 300 Win Mag
- 10mm vs .45 ACP
- 277 Fury vs 223
- 6.8 SPC vs 300 Blackout
- 6.5 PRC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 277 Fury vs 308
- 277 Fury vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 350 Legend vs 450 Bushmaster
- 277 Fury Vs 5.56 NATO
- 10mm vs 40S&W
- 32 ACP vs 9mm
- 32 Special vs 9mm
- 8.6 Blackout vs 300 Blackout
- 30 Super Carry vs. 9mm
- 5.56 vs 9mm
- .50 Action Express vs 9mm
- 7.62x25 vs. 9mm
- 10mm vs 44 Magnum
- 300 Blackout vs 300 Win Mag
- 6.5 Grendel vs 300 Blackout
- 460 Rowland vs 10mm
- 300 RUM vs 300 PRC
- 300 Norma vs 300 PRC
- 45 GAP vs 45 ACP
- 7mm PRC vs 300 Win Mag
- 300 PRC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 300 PRC vs 308
- 357 SIG vs 357 Mag
- 7.62x39 vs 7.62x51
- 243 Win vs 223 Rem
- 30 Nosler vs 300 PRC
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 30-06 Springfield
- 450 S&W vs. 44 Magnum
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 300 Win Mag
- 454 Cassull vs. 45-70 Govt
- 454 Cassull vs. 44 Mag
- 7.62x54r vs. 308 Winchester
- 22 ARC vs. 223 Rem
- Subsonic vs. Supersonic Ammo
- Hornady Critical Defense vs. Critical Duty
- 45 Colt vs. 45 Long Colt
- 25 ACP vs. 22 LR
- 45 Long Colt vs. 44 Magnum
- 38 Special vs. 38 S&W
- 44 Special vs. 357 Magnum
- 5.45 vs. 5.56
- 38 Special vs. 380 ACP
- 30-06 vs. 5.56
- 6mm ARC vs. 5.56 NATO
- 38 Super vs. 9mm
- 22 ARC vs. 6mm ARC
- 408 CheyTac vs. 50 BMG
- 44 Special vs. 45 ACP
- 380 ACP vs. 45 ACP
- 22 LR vs. 223 Rem
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 223 Rem
- 25 ACP vs. 9mm
- 357 Magnum vs. 45 ACP
- 28 Gauge vs. 20 Gauge