6.8 SPC vs. 6.5 Grendel: Enhancing the AR-15 Platform
In the early 2000’s, there was a big push from the U.S. Army to adapt new, more powerful cartridges to the M4 carbine. This initiative was prompted by battlefield reports of enemy combatants taking multiple hits from 5.56 NATO rounds and remaining combat effective.
The 6.8 Remington Special Purpose Cartridge (SPC) and 6.5 Grendel were two new cartridges developed to increase the lethality of the AR-15 platform. Although their terminal ballistics are impressive, neither cartridge was adopted for mainstream military use.
The 6.8 SPC and 6.5 Grendel may not have seen frontline combat, but they have received moderate commercial success from shooters who want a little more oomph out of their semi-automatic sporting rifles. Today, 6.8 SPC ammo is readily available for civilian shooters seeking enhanced terminal performance.
Many 2A enthusiasts who want something other than the standard 5.56 NATO/223 Remington chambering are perplexed over which cartridge to select for their new AR-15. Is the 6.8 SPC better than 6.5 Grendel? Or does the 6.5 Grendel come out on top?
In this article we’ll discuss the relative merits and shortcomings of the 6.8 SPC and 6.5 Grendel, and why either round might be better for your shooting needs.
What Is the Difference Between 6.8 SPC and 6.5 Grendel?
The main differences between the 6.8 SPC and 6.5 Grendel are their bullet diameters and intended purpose. The 6.8 SPC fires 0.277” diameter bullets; the 6.5 Grendel, 0.264”. And while the 6.8 SPC is intended for close quarters battle (CQB) with short barreled rifles (i.e. 16” or shorter), the 6.5 Grendel is optimized for covering longer distances with a 20” or longer barrel.
Cartridge Specs
When evaluating two rifle cartridges, it’s good to begin by comparing their physical specifications.
The biggest difference between the 6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC are the bullets each fires.
The 6.5 Grendel fires the same sleek, aerodynamic 0.264” diameter bullets as other long-range cartridges like the 6.5 Creedmoor, 260 Remington, and 6.5 PRC. 6.5 Grendel ammo is typically loaded with bullets weighing between 90 and 130 grains, with 100, 110, 120 and 123 grains being most popular.
Modern 6.5 Grendel ammo manufacturers have optimized these loads for exceptional long-range accuracy.
On the other hand, the 6.8 SPC fires wider 0.277” diameter bullets, just like the 270 Winchester, 6.8 Western, and 277 SIG Fury. The 6.8 SPC typically fires bullets weighing 75 to 120 grains, with 85, 100, 110, 115, and 120 grains being the most common.
The 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC have different base diameters: 0.439” and 0.422”, respectively. Both cartridges require a bolt change when performing a conversion on a 5.56/223 AR-15.
The 6.8 SPC case is slightly longer than the 6.5 Grendel’s: 1.687”, as opposed to 1.520”. Both cartridges have the same overall length of 2.26&0rdquo; (the longest the AR-15 platform can accommodate). Its longer case requires more of the 6.8 SPC’s bullet to be seated inside the brass. This reduces the quantity of propellant the cartridge can contain, which has a negative impact on ballistic performance. On the other hand, the design of the 6.5 Grendel allows for a longer, more ballistically efficient bullet which doesn’t have to be seated very deep inside its case.
Even though the 6.8 SPC has a longer case, it has virtually the same case capacity as the 6.5 Grendel. However, the 6.8 SPC is rated to handle slightly higher chamber pressures: 55,000 psi, as opposed to 52,000 psi per SAAMI specifications.
Recoil
The 6.8 SPC generally has slightly less recoil than the 6.5 Grendel.
Recoil is an important consideration when purchasing a new rifle, as a round with heavy recoil is more difficult to control and will slow your rate of follow up shots.
Rifle recoil is wholly determined by four factors: rifle weight, bullet weight, propellant charge weight, and muzzle velocity (measured in feet per second, or fps).
The 6.5 Grendel typically has slightly more free recoil energy than the 6.8 SPC. For example, a 6.5 Grendel 123gr SST fired from a 6 lb AR-15 at 2,500 fps muzzle velocity generates approximately 11 ft-lbs free recoil energy; significantly higher than the 9 ft-lbs generated by a 6.8 SPC 120gr SST fired at 2,400 fps from the same rifle.
Both cartridges are considered low recoil. Shooters can enjoy a full day at the range firing either without any shoulder-bruising effects. However, for recoil sensitive shooters, the 6.8 SPC is typically the better option.
Muzzle Velocity and Kinetic Energy
The 6.5 Grendel generally has higher muzzle velocity and energy than the 6.8 SPC.
Since the 6.5 Grendel was designed for long-range target shooting, it requires better ballistics to reach its target. However, manufacturers’ ballistic data can sometimes be misleading due to differences in barrel lengths.
Take the 6.5 Grendel 123gr SST and 6.8 SPC 120gr SST factory loads, for example. Hornady states that the 6.5 Grendel 123gr round has a muzzle velocity of 2,580 fps and muzzle energy of 1,818 ft-lbs when fired from a 24” barrel. On the other hand, the 6.8 SPC 120gr SST is reported as having a muzzle velocity of 2,460 fps and muzzle energy of 1,612 ft-lbs from a 16” barrel.
That difference in barrel length is quite significant, and underscores one of the major differences between these two cartridges. The 6.8 SPC was specifically designed for use in the M4 carbine, which has a 14.5” barrel, while Alexander Arms (the developer of the 6.5 Grendel) recommends using a barrel no shorter than 20” for its cartridge.
Those familiar with long-range shooting know that a long barrel is preferred over a short one, as bullets fired from a shorter barrel typically have lower muzzle velocity. Although the 6.8 SPC can reach its peak performance in a short barrel, the 6.5 Grendel needs the extra barrel length to reach its full potential.
If you were to fire 6.5 Grendel from a 16” barrel, most of its ballistic advantage over the 6.8 SPC would erased. Both cartridges have similar muzzle velocity and muzzle energy when fired from two barrels sharing the same length.
When selecting ammunition, it's crucial to choose 6.5 Grendel ammo specifically optimized for your barrel length to achieve maximum performance.
Trajectory
When fired from a longer barrel, the 6.5 Grendel has a flatter trajectory across all ranges compared to the 6.8 SPC.
Trajectory is how we quantify a bullet’s flight path as it travels downrange, as measured in inches of bullet rise and/or drop.
A flatter-shooting cartridge is preferred for long-range shooting, as it requires a shooter to make fewer adjustments to compensate for bullet drop. Having a flatter trajectory also means that a cartridge will be more forgiving of ranging mistakes.
At shorter ranges (under 200 yards), both cartridges have virtually identical trajectories. However, with its higher muzzle velocity and more ballistically efficient bullets, the 6.5 Grendel dominates the 6.8 SPC over longer ranges. Assuming a 100-yard zero for both cartridges, at 500 yards the 6.5 Grendel exhibits -64” of bullet dropl the 6.8 SPC, -79”.
Ballistic Coefficient
The 6.5 Grendel generally has higher ballistic coefficients, as it is designed to fire longer, more aerodynamic bullets.
Ballistic coefficient (BC) is a measure of how well a bullet resists wind drift and frontal air resistance. Put another way, it’s a numeric representation of how aerodynamic a bullet is. A high BC is preferred as it indicates the bullet will buck the wind better.
Heavier bullets typically have a higher BC, as it takes more force to disrupt their flight. BC also varies from bullet to bullet based on design and other factors which are beyond the scope of this article.
The ability of 6.5mm bullets to resist wind drift is well documented with the rise in popularity of the 6.5 Creedmoor. As the 6.5 Grendel can fire the same sleek bullets as the 6.5 Creedmoor, it is unsurprising that the 6.5 Grendel will outperform the 6.8 SPC in terms of BC.
Take, for example, the Barnes TSX bullet, which is extremely popular with big game hunters. The 6.5 Grendel 120gr TSX bullet has a G1 BC of 0.412 – much higher than the 6.8 SPC 110gr TSX’s 0.377 G1 BC.
Sectional Density
The 6.5 Grendel typically has a higher sectional density (SD) than the 6.8 SPC.
SD is the measure of how well a bullet penetrates its target. This is extremely important when hunting big and medium game, as you need a bullet that can punch through thick hide, bone, and sinew.
SD is calculated by comparing the bullet’s weight and diameter. The higher its SD, the deeper the bullet is capable of penetrating the target. (This is a simplified view of penetration. There are other factors to consider, such as bullet expansion and impact velocity.)
As the 6.5 Grendel utilizes a longer bullet, it is able to focus its higher kinetic energy onto a smaller area on impact, thereby increasing its penetration.
For example, the 6.5 Grendel 100gr Ballistic Tip bullet has an SD of 0.205; a 6.8 SPC 100gr AccuBond, 0.186.
While the 6.5 Grendel does generally have a higher SD than the 6.8 SPC, the difference is so minor that it is unlikely that any hunter, whitetail, or feral hogs will be able to tell the difference.
Hunting
Although the 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC have not been issued to GI’s on the front lines, hunters have confirmed their power and flexibility in the field.
Both cartridges are exceptional at deer hunting, though the 6.5 Grendel is better suited for varmints while the 6.8 SPC has made a name for itself in hog hunting circles.
With its long-range capabilities and flat trajectory, the 6.5 Grendel is an excellent choice for varmint hunting. Its longer effective range of over 1,000 yards and better ballistic performance helps the 6.5 Grendel excel at dispatching thin-skinned varmints. This is not to say that the 6.8 DPC cannot be used on varmints, although the superior ballistic coefficient of the 6.5 Grendel really makes it an attractive choice for long-range shooting.
Both the 6.5 and the 6.8 are exceptional choices for whitetail and mule deer at conventional ranges. The 6.8 SPC has an effective range of around 200 yards for deer, while the 6.5 Grendel can harvest them out to 400 yards. However, the 6.8 SPC gets the nod here, as its terminal performance on game animals is slightly better than the 6.5 – and it can achieve these results when fired from a shorter barrel. When you’re sitting in a tree stand or maneuvering through thick brush, a lighter and more compact rifle is easier to handle. Since the 6.8 SPC is optimized for hunting with a 16” barrel, it is the better choice while hunting in heavily wooded areas like those found in the Midwest or Pacific Northwest. If longer shots need to be taken like those on the Great Plains – and barrel length is less of an issue – then the 6.5 Grendel would be a better choice.
The 6.8 SPC has quite the reputation as a hog slaying round in the Southern states. Its deadly terminal ballistics and lower recoil impulse both suit it better for popping swine in rapid succession. The 6.5 Grendel’s longer effective range is less important when hog hunting, when most shots are within 250 yards or less.
Ammo and Rifle Cost/Availability
The 6.8 SPC and 6.5 Grendel are about the same as far as ammo availability is concerned. Most major ammo manufacturers like Remington, S&B, Federal, Nosler, and Barnes load both.
Inexpensive 6.8 SPC ammo costs around $1.40/round for FMJ loads; slightly less expensive than 6.5 Grendel at $1.70/round (at the time of writing).
The 6.5 Grendel has a slight edge over the 6.8 SPC in terms of rifle variety. Premium AR-15 manufacturers like Wilson Combat, LWRC, Savage, and Barrett have offerings in both, with dedicated rifles and upper receivers 6.5 and 6.8.
If you want a bolt gun, then the 6.5 Grendel is your only option. The 6.8 SPC is limited to the AR-15 only at the time of writing. The Ruger American Ranch and Predator, Howa Mini, and CZ 527 are currently the only bolt-action rifles available in 6.5 Grendel.
Reloading
Brass, reloading dies, primers, and powders are readily available for each cartridge. When it comes to bullet selection, the 6.5 has a slight edge due to the proliferation and popularity of the 6.5 Creedmoor. Since the 6.5 Grendel shares the same caliber as the 6.5 Creedmoor, it offers a handloaders a wider array of bullet options than 6.8 SPC.
However, since the U.S. Army recently adopted the 277 SIG Fury as its new battle cartridge, the future is looking bright for fans of the 6.8 caliber bullet.
6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel Ballistics
Here are tables illustrating the ballistic performance of several different 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC cartridges.
6.5 Grendel Ballistics
Note: This information comes from ammo manufacturers. Actual ballistics obtained with your firearm can vary considerably the advertised ballistics. Also, ballistics can vary from lot to lot with the same brand and type load. For a more comprehensive breakdown across all manufacturers and loads, see our full 6.5 Grendel ballistics guide.
| Bullet | Barrel Length (in) | G1 BC | Velocity (fps) | Energy (ft-lbs) | Elevation (in) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | |||
| 90gr TNT | 24 | 0.260 | 3000 | 2642 | 2310 | 2004 | 1723 | 1475 | 1799 | 1395 | 1067 | 802 | 593 | 426 | -1.5 | 1.8 | 0.0 | -8.3 | -25.4 | -54.2 |
| 100gr ELD-VT | 24 | 0.448 | 2730 | 2531 | 2340 | 2158 | 1984 | 1819 | 1655 | 1422 | 1216 | 1034 | 874 | 734 | -1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -8.4 | -24.2 | -48.9 |
| 120gr Bonded SP | 24 | 0.340 | 2600 | 2346 | 2107 | 1883 | 1675 | 1487 | 1802 | 1467 | 1184 | 945 | 748 | 589 | -1.5 | 2.4 | 0.0 | -10.3 | -30.4 | -63.0 |
| 120gr OTM | 24 | 0.421 | 2610 | 2404 | 2207 | 2020 | 1842 | 1676 | 1815 | 1540 | 1298 | 1087 | 904 | 748 | -1.5 | 2.3 | 0.0 | -9.4 | -27.4 | -55.6 |
| 123gr ELD-M | 24 | 0.506 | 2580 | 2409 | 2244 | 2086 | 1935 | 1790 | 1818 | 1585 | 1376 | 1189 | 1022 | 876 | -1.5 | 2.3 | 0.0 | -9.2 | -26.4 | -52.9 |
6.8 SPC Ballistics
Note: This information comes from ammo manufacturers. Actual ballistics obtained with your firearm can vary considerably the advertised ballistics. Also, ballistics can vary from lot to lot with the same brand and type load. For a more comprehensive breakdown across all manufacturers and loads, see our full 6.8 SPC ballistics guide.
| Bullet | Barrel Length (in) | G1 BC | Velocity (fps) | Energy (ft-lbs) | Elevation (in) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | |||
| 90gr Bonded SP | 16 | 0.278 | 2850 | 2625 | 2222 | 1941 | 1684 | 1455 | 1623 | 1274 | 987 | 753 | 567 | 423 | -1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -9.1 | -27.5 | -58.2 |
| 100gr V-MAX | 16 | 0.370 | 2575 | 2343 | 2123 | 1915 | 1721 | 1543 | 1473 | 1219 | 1001 | 815 | 658 | 529 | -1.5 | 2.4 | 0.0 | -10.2 | -29.9 | -61.3 |
| 115gr HPBT | 23.5 | 0.324 | 2477 | 2218 | 1976 | 1751 | 1546 | 1365 | 1567 | 1257 | 997 | 783 | 610 | 476 | -1.5 | 2.8 | 0.0 | -11.74 | -34.9 | -72.7 |
| 115gr TMJ | 16 | 0.378 | 2675 | 2443 | 2222 | 2013 | 1816 | 1634 | 1828 | 1524 | 1261 | 1035 | 843 | 682 | -1.5 | 2.2 | 0.0 | -9.2 | -27.1 | -55.5 |
| 120gr SST | 16 | 0.400 | 2460 | 2250 | 2051 | 1863 | 1686 | 1524 | 1613 | 1349 | 1121 | 924 | 758 | 619 | -1.5 | 2.7 | 0.0 | -11.0 | -32.0 | -65.4 |
A Brief History of 6.5 Grendel
Ever since the adoption of the 223 Remington/5.56 NATO cartridge by the U.S. Armed Forces, critics have questioned the combat effectiveness and terminal ballistics of the .22 caliber round. As a result, several intermediate cartridges have been adapted to the AR-15 platform such as the 300 Blackout and 6.8 SPC in an attempt to bridge the gap between the 223 Reminton and 308 Winchester.
Never one to back down from a challenge, British/American armorer Bill Alexander of Alexander Arms debuted the 6.5 Grendel in May 2003 at the Blackwater training facility in North Carolina. Alexander Arms also utilized the services of competitive shooter Arne Brennan and senior ballistician Janne Pohjoispää of Lapua in development of the new rifle cartridge.
Bill Alexander was clearly a fan of mythology, as Grendel is the name of a monster in the epic British poem Beowulf. True to form, Alexander Arms also developed the 50 Beowulf cartridge for the AR-15 as well.
The goal for developing the 6.5 Grendel was to produce an intermediate cartridge that extends the effective range of AR-15 rifles out past 800 yards. Utilizing the same higher ballistic coefficient 0.264” diameter bullets as the 6.5 Creedmoor, the 6.5 Grendel is capable or maintaining MOA-level accuracy and supersonic velocities out to 1,200 yards with half the recoil of the 308 Win.
The 6.5 Grendel has a wider case head than the 223 Remington, and requires a non-standard AR-15 bolt and specialized magazines for use in AR-15 rifles.
Widespread adoption of the 6.5 Grendel was somewhat hindered by Bill Alexander himself. He insisted that the cartridge be trademarked, which meant it could not be standardized by SAAMI. However, Alexander Arms (in collaboration with Hornady) registered the 6.5 Grendel with SAAMI in 2010. This allowed other manufacturers to create and sell 6.5 Grendel ammo, which greatly expanded the cartridge’s reach.
Though the 6.5 Grendel is still a relatively new cartridge, it has developed a stalwart following among those who appreciate the terminal ballistics of a 308 Win without having to upgrade to an AR-10.
With exceptional long-range capability, barrel life, and MOA-level accuracy, the 6.5 Grendel is an excellent choice if you’re looking to upgrade your AR-15 platform to something that has a bit more stopping power than a 223 Rem.
A Brief History of 6.8 SPC
The 6.8 Remington Special Purpose Cartridge (6.8 SPC, 6.8 SPC II, or 6.8x43mm) was developed in 2004 as a joint operation between Remington Arms, U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), and the U.S. Army Marksmanship unit.
The goal for the cartridge was to increase the terminal performance of the M4 carbine, as urban close quarters battle (CQB) in the Second Iraq War had showcased some deficiencies in the 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge.
Initial designs for the 6.8 SPC came from Master Sgt. Steve Holland and Chris Murray. They used the 30 Remington as a parent case, modifying it to fit in standard M4 magazines.
One key design point was that the 6.8 SPC should perform well in short-barreled rifles (SBRs), such as the M4 carbine, as opposed to the longer M16 assault rifle.
When fired from an M4, the 6.8 SPC can deliver almost 45% more kinetic energy to its target than standard 5.56 62gr M855 ammunition.
Although the 6.8 SPC seemed to be a potent answer to the 5.56 NATO terminal performance issue, there were some problems with its implementation. The chamber designs for the original 6.8 SPC cartridge were somewhat inaccurate, the biggest issue being the free bore space at the mouth of the chamber.
Original chamber designs called for 0.050” of free bore. But combined with a 1:10” twist rate barrel, pressure issues began to creep up as a result of that free bore length. Initial reports claimed that the rounds were only around 200 psi above the maximum 55,000 psi pressure limits. But if the military learned anything from Vietnam, it was to follow specs to the letter.
Remington sought to remedy the issue by underloading the ammo, but by then it was too late. The U.S. military passed.
However, in all the excitement over the new 6.8 SPC, several civilian firearm manufactures clambered to release rifles chambered in the new hotshot round before SAAMI had officially adopted the cartridge. With numerous faulty rifles in the wild, the only action SAAMI could take was to sanction the round.
This is not to say that original 6.8 SPC rifles won’t function properly, but there is the potential for a critical pressure failure when using full power rounds.
The answer was the 6.8 SPC II.
The 6.8 SPC II added an additional 0.050” of free bore to the chamber and decreased the barrel twist rate to 1:11”. This completely solved the pressure issues exhibited with the original design. All current rifles chambered in 6.8 SPC are actually chambered in 6.8 SPC II.
The 6.8 SPC II offers hunters an excellent intermediate cartridge option for small to medium game, and handloaders love the cartridge for its versatility. Capable of firing 85 to 140 grain bullets, the 6.8 SPC II gives reloaders the ability to load their ammo light for plinking and hot for hunting.
Although most factory loads are loaded light (due to original 6.8 SPC rifles still in the wild), the 6.8 SPC II sits in the sweet spot between the ubiquitous 0.308” and diminutive 0.224” calibers. This offers shooters the power they need for medium game hunting without the increased recoil and heavier firearms associated with the 308.
Final Shots: 6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC
The 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC are two intermediate cartridges developed to increase the lethality of the 5.56 NATO AR-15 platform. Both achieved this goal.
Adapting new cartridges to the AR-15 is nothing new, as other offerings like the 224 Valkyrie and 300 Blackout also enhance the breadth and depth of ammo options for the most popular sporting rifle in the world.
The 6.5 Grendel is a great option for long-range target shooting and an extremely capable hunting cartridge. Its sleek 6.5mm bullets have incredibly high ballistic coefficients and sectional densities that make it a potent long-range round. The one limiting factor to the 6.5 Grendel is its reliance on a longer barrel of 20” or more to achieve its full potential.
The 6.8 Remington Special Purpose Cartridge focuses more on terminal performance in a short barreled rifle (SBR) over long-range performance. Optimized for the M4 carbine with a 16” or shorter barrel, the 6.8 SPC offers shooters a powerful cartridge that delivers 40% more kinetic energy than the 5.56 NATO within 300 yards in a tight, lightweight package. However, the 6.8 is less effective at longer ranges, as it hemorrhages energy and velocity at distances beyond 500 yards.
Selecting the right cartridge for your needs primarily centers on what ranges you expect to shoot at. For typical hunting ranges of 300 yards or less, the 6.8 SPC has a lot to offer with lower recoil and better terminal ballistics in a shorter rifle. However, if you expect to shoot over 300 yards and don’t mind using a longer barrel, then the 6.5 Grendel is cartridge that can extend your effective range out past 500 yards.
Regardless of which cartridge you choose, make sure you stock up on ammunition here at Ammo.com. If you're shooting high volumes at the range, our bulk AR 15 ammo page has options across multiple AR calibers at volume pricing. I'll see you on the range!
Ammo Comparisons
- .308 vs 5.56
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs .308
- .300 Blackout vs .308
- .300 Win Mag vs .308
- .243 vs .308
- .308 vs .30-06
- 7mm-08 vs .308
- .270 vs .308
- 7.62x39 vs .308
- .223 vs .308
- .338 Lapua vs .308
- .380 ACP vs 9mm
- .223 vs 5.56
- .300 Blackout vs 5.56
- 9mm vs 45 ACP
- 9mm vs 40 S&W
- .357 SIG vs 9mm
- 10mm vs 9mm
- 9mm vs 9mm Luger
- .243 vs .270
- .300 Win Mag vs .30-06
- .270 vs .30-06
- .40 vs .45
- 38 Special vs 357
- 9mm vs 40 vs 45
- 5.56 vs 7.62x39
- 338 Lapua vs .30-06
- .30-30 vs .30-06
- 300 PRC vs 338 Lapua
- .30-06 vs 7mm
- 300 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua
- 300 PRC vs 300 Win Mag
- 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag
- 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua
- 12 Gauge vs 20 Gauge
- 10mm vs 357 Mag
- .30-30 vs 7.62x39
- 224 Valkyrie vs 22-250
- 17 HMR vs 22 Mag
- 7.62x39 vs .300 Blackout
- 45 ACP vs 45 Auto
- 45-70 vs 30-30
- 300 Blackout vs 223
- 357 Magnum vs 9mm
- 350 Legend vs 300 Blackout
- 224 Valkyrie vs 223
- 45 ACP vs 38 Super
- 6.5 Grendel vs .308
- 17 HMR vs 22 LR
- 10 Gauge vs 12 Gauge
- 22-250 vs 223
- 45 Colt vs 45 ACP
- 350 Legend vs 30-30
- 5.7x28 vs 223
- 5.7 vs 9mm
- 5.56 vs 5.7
- 22 vs 9mm
- Buckshot vs Birdshot
- 450 Bushmaster vs 308
- 450 Bushmaster vs 223
- Buckshot vs Slug
- 6.5 Grendel vs 5.56
- 6mm ARC vs 6.5 Grendel
- 44 vs 45
- 458 SOCOM vs 5.56
- 357 vs 44
- 32 ACP vs 380
- 300 Win Mag vs 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua Mag
- 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM vs 50 Beowulf
- 6mm Creedmoor vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- TMJ vs FMJ
- 44 Special Vs 44 Magnum
- 45 90 vs 45 70
- 6.8 Western vs 6.8 SPC
- 50 Beowulf vs 50 BMG
- 26 Nosler vs 6.5 PRC
- 28 Gauge vs 410
- 6.8 SPC vs 5.56
- 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel
- 6.8 Western vs 7mm Rem Mag vs .28 Nosler
- 6.8 Western vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 22 Hornet vs 223
- 6.8 Western vs 6.5 PRC
- .410 vs 12 Gauge
- .410 vs 20 Gauge
- 22 LR vs 22 Mag
- 6mm ARC vs 243
- 7mm-08 vs 270
- 243 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- Nickel vs Brass Casing
- 204 Ruger vs 223
- 50 Beowulf vs 5.56
- 260 Remington vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 6mm Remington vs 243
- 28 Nosler vs 300 PRC
- 50 Beowulf vs 50 AE
- 22 Nosler vs 22-250
- 450 Marlin vs 45-70
- 300 Win Mag vs 300 Norma
- 458 SOCOM vs 300 Blackout
- 38-55 vs 45-70
- 22 Hornet vs 22 LR
- 300 Norma vs 338 Lapua
- 338 Lapua vs 50 BMG
- 28 Nosler vs 300 Win Mag
- 28 Nosler vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 204 vs 22-250
- 458 SOCOM vs 45 70
- 44 40 vs 45 70
- 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 450 Bushmaster vs 30-06
- 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag
- 30 Carbine vs 223
- 25-06 vs 30-06
- 26 Nosler vs 28 Nosler
- 16ga vs 12ga
- 30 06 vs 7.62 x54R
- 9mm Makarov vs 9mm Luger
- 350 Legend vs 223
- 30 Carbine vs 5.56
- 6.5x55 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs 270
- M193 vs M855
- 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM
- 6.5 Grendel vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 350 Legend vs 5.56
- .277 Fury vs 6.8 SPC
- 277 Fury vs 300 Win Mag
- 10mm vs .45 ACP
- 277 Fury vs 223
- 6.8 SPC vs 300 Blackout
- 6.5 PRC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 277 Fury vs 308
- 277 Fury vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 350 Legend vs 450 Bushmaster
- 277 Fury Vs 5.56 NATO
- 10mm vs 40S&W
- 32 ACP vs 9mm
- 32 Special vs 9mm
- 8.6 Blackout vs 300 Blackout
- 30 Super Carry vs. 9mm
- 5.56 vs 9mm
- .50 Action Express vs 9mm
- 7.62x25 vs. 9mm
- 10mm vs 44 Magnum
- 300 Blackout vs 300 Win Mag
- 6.5 Grendel vs 300 Blackout
- 460 Rowland vs 10mm
- 300 RUM vs 300 PRC
- 300 Norma vs 300 PRC
- 45 GAP vs 45 ACP
- 7mm PRC vs 300 Win Mag
- 300 PRC vs 6.5 Creedmoor
- 300 PRC vs 308
- 357 SIG vs 357 Mag
- 7.62x39 vs 7.62x51
- 243 Win vs 223 Rem
- 30 Nosler vs 300 PRC
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 30-06 Springfield
- 450 S&W vs. 44 Magnum
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 300 Win Mag
- 454 Cassull vs. 45-70 Govt
- 454 Cassull vs. 44 Mag
- 7.62x54r vs. 308 Winchester
- 22 ARC vs. 223 Rem
- Subsonic vs. Supersonic Ammo
- Hornady Critical Defense vs. Critical Duty
- 45 Colt vs. 45 Long Colt
- 25 ACP vs. 22 LR
- 45 Long Colt vs. 44 Magnum
- 38 Special vs. 38 S&W
- 44 Special vs. 357 Magnum
- 5.45 vs. 5.56
- 38 Special vs. 380 ACP
- 30-06 vs. 5.56
- 6mm ARC vs. 5.56 NATO
- 38 Super vs. 9mm
- 22 ARC vs. 6mm ARC
- 408 CheyTac vs. 50 BMG
- 44 Special vs. 45 ACP
- 380 ACP vs. 45 ACP
- 22 LR vs. 223 Rem
- 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 223 Rem
- 25 ACP vs. 9mm
- 357 Magnum vs. 45 ACP
- 28 Gauge vs. 20 Gauge